Phil Pascoe
Established Member
At least this forum should be active tonight, with all the sad people staying up to watch the results. 
sad people
- Thread starter Phil Pascoe
- Start date
Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:
- Status
Phil Pascoe
Established Member
Best you carry on praying, I think.
RogerS
Established Member
Woo hoo !!
John15
Established Member
I'm one of the sad people despite chucking my voting card into the recycling bin. I enjoyed listening in between dozing to the results as they came in through the night. On balance I think it's best that the Tories will now be able to continue with their recovery plan.
John
John
Myfordman
AKA 9Fingers
Isn't this forum supposed to be a politics free zone??
Cheshirechappie
Established Member
On the basis that I couldn't do anything whatever to change things once my vote had been cast, I had a long and peaceful night's sleep and found out this morning what was happening after making a refreshing mug of tea. It would seem that the opinion pollsters had a 'mixed' night!
RogerS
Established Member
Cheshirechappie":27sz22ob said:
Did any pollsters call it correctly ?
Nope, doesn't look like it. How did thank yank who "always gets it right" do, anyone know? :lol:
Update: it was Nate Silver on BBC's Panorama. And yes, he got it completely wrong as well. I do wish the BBC hadn't spent my licence fee flying this plonker over from the U.S. ... :lol:
Update: it was Nate Silver on BBC's Panorama. And yes, he got it completely wrong as well. I do wish the BBC hadn't spent my licence fee flying this plonker over from the U.S. ... :lol:
RogerS
Established Member
And where's that octopus when you need him?
Phil Pascoe
Established Member
I am surprised that more people didn't stay up. I expected a few posts through the early hours - not political, just time wasting.
I am looking forward to Alistair Campbell eating his kilt.
I am looking forward to Alistair Campbell eating his kilt.
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
It was pretty obvious from the 10 pm exit polls; pathetic fiasco - no change likely - nothing to sit up for.
Except the tories who deserved to be booted out for good, they got what they deserved; Lib dems for being tory toadies, Labour for feebly supporting the tories over Scotland and being feeble about austerity, SNP for listening to their people!
Except the tories who deserved to be booted out for good, they got what they deserved; Lib dems for being tory toadies, Labour for feebly supporting the tories over Scotland and being feeble about austerity, SNP for listening to their people!
Phil Pascoe
Established Member
no change likely - nothing to sit up for.
Bit wrong there, Jacob.
Bit wrong there, Jacob.
wellywood
Established Member
I'm well out of touch with UK political identities but had to read one of the Telegraph-on-line latest news flashes twice to make sure i got it right.
'Ed Balls loses his seat...'
He's fortunate not to have been called Ed Seat? :shock:
'Ed Balls loses his seat...'
He's fortunate not to have been called Ed Seat? :shock:
Woodmonkey
Established Member
Jacob":2s6rgiq5 said:
Pretty fair summation really, except you didn't mention the great British public who will also now get what they deserve for voting Tory, ie. 5 years of austerity. Enjoy!
Cheshirechappie
Established Member
It's an odd sort of 'austerity' though, isn't it? No food rationing, no fuel shortages, no Utility furniture, no shortages of anything (except housing). Go and ask the Greeks about 'austerity' - they've actually got some.
Back in the 2010 election campaign, the Labour party's stated plan was to halve the deficit over five years, allowing the economy to be stimulated by borrowed money. Others felt that plan was reckless, as it would cause the National Debt to rise to levels that would shackle future generations. This plan was rejected by the electorate, but - oddly enough - it's pretty well exactly what's come to pass. The deficit has reduced from about £180bn at it's worst to about £90 last year. That's still pretty much exactly the 'fiscal stimulus' that people like Ed Balls was advocating in 2010. The National Debt has grown pretty well exactly as opponents of that policy said it would, and interest on debt is now a larger proportion of public spending every year than defence is.
What Labour called for in 2010 has come to pass. Yet still they criticise 'austerity'. I'm afraid I don't understand what they're complaining about. I rather suspect that quite a chunk of the 2015 electorate didn't have much confidence in their analysis or plans, either.
Back in the 2010 election campaign, the Labour party's stated plan was to halve the deficit over five years, allowing the economy to be stimulated by borrowed money. Others felt that plan was reckless, as it would cause the National Debt to rise to levels that would shackle future generations. This plan was rejected by the electorate, but - oddly enough - it's pretty well exactly what's come to pass. The deficit has reduced from about £180bn at it's worst to about £90 last year. That's still pretty much exactly the 'fiscal stimulus' that people like Ed Balls was advocating in 2010. The National Debt has grown pretty well exactly as opponents of that policy said it would, and interest on debt is now a larger proportion of public spending every year than defence is.
What Labour called for in 2010 has come to pass. Yet still they criticise 'austerity'. I'm afraid I don't understand what they're complaining about. I rather suspect that quite a chunk of the 2015 electorate didn't have much confidence in their analysis or plans, either.
lurker
Le dullard de la commune
Don't get ill
Don't get old
Don't lose your job
And you will be alright ....... jack
Don't get old
Don't lose your job
And you will be alright ....... jack
Cheshirechappie
Established Member
lurker":7qapbpx7 said:
....and don't be young, because you'll be paying interest on a whacking great National Debt for all your life.
Labour plan of 2010 rejected by the electorate. Between 2010 and 2015, Labour's plan implemented by the Conservative/LibDem coalition, their own plans being missed by some margin. In 2015, Conservatives returned with a slim majority, despite what actually came to pass in the last five years.
It's a funny old world.
Jacob
What goes around comes around.
The deficit is a bit of a myth as a lot of people have been saying for a long time. An excuse for screwing the less well off and keep taxes down. Doesn't take a lot of googling to find out the real picture. http://falseeconomy.org.uk/cure/how-big-is-the-problem
I don't think the electorate reject "plans" as such - they are more interested in general intentions; "principles" for those parties which have them.
Labour's big mistake in this election was that stupid menu of promises - every one a hostage to fortune and likely to miss the target, and not necessarily the answer to every individual's concerns. Statements of broad principles would have been a much better propaganda exercise. If there's one thing the tories don't have it's principles but Labour have been trying to fight them on their terms.
This is probably the lowest point of the labour campaign, where they are scraping the bottom of the barrel and trying a bit of racism, just like the others:
I don't think the electorate reject "plans" as such - they are more interested in general intentions; "principles" for those parties which have them.
Labour's big mistake in this election was that stupid menu of promises - every one a hostage to fortune and likely to miss the target, and not necessarily the answer to every individual's concerns. Statements of broad principles would have been a much better propaganda exercise. If there's one thing the tories don't have it's principles but Labour have been trying to fight them on their terms.
This is probably the lowest point of the labour campaign, where they are scraping the bottom of the barrel and trying a bit of racism, just like the others:
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
