Slim":1ls2njh0 said:Safety features like this are all well and good, but where is the crown guard and short fence? :roll:
Slim":2hphfmjy said:Safety features like this are all well and good, but where is the crown guard and short fence? :roll:
Niki":32ypouse said:Slim":32ypouse said:Safety features like this are all well and good, but where is the crown guard and short fence? :roll:
You totally missed the point......If they will use crown guard (blade guard in American) short fence and some push sticks....what for is the need for sawstop....
Hi RichardRichard Findley":25ah15li said:How does it know :?: :?:
I noticed he didn't risk his own finger.... just in case :wink: but that still doesn't tell me... how does it know what it's cutting :?: :shock: :?:
Richard Findley":2xaoi6d1 said:Hi Niki,
I totally agree on the safety points. It's a clever bit of kit though! Looks like when you activate the emergency brake thingy the whole thing is pretty much scrap metal :?: Is that right??
Richard
tnimble":x7jr713x said:When such a saw would come over to Europe the electrical brake to stop the blade within 10 seconds rule should not apply any more. The fast stop is to prevent one cutting off their limbs after having used the saw. The sawstop type mechanism supersedes this 10s bracking action with a much faster brake and on top of that full blade retraction.
When the overide is engaged for cutting cunductive materials the saw not retracking should only be active if the saw is active.Niki":2utv3y4d said:I'm not sure that you are correct...as long as the sawstop feature can be disabled...and it can be (for wet wood or others reasons) the "10 seconds" law is also disabled...and I don't think that SHE will agree...
Its not always that it are the regulatory bodies. Some things are done only because its thought necessary whilst there is no rule demanding that specific thing. Sometimes rules are used without having the conditions to which the rule applies. Sometimes things are just implemented while in the specific situation it makes no sense and no dispensation is asked. Sometimes (especially with changes) rules are vague or their meaning misinterpreted and ill implemented.As you know our TS are coming with riving knife and guard only....no anti-kickback pawls (fingers) but, the American OSHA (SHE) still demands the anti-kickback pawl without any connection if the saw is equipped with riving knife or splitter (and they know why...)
So the Americans are still getting the Bosch 4000 (the American brother of the GTS 10 that costs half price in USA :evil: ) with riving knife and...anti-kickback pawls...
Not so easy to change safety regulations...
I don't know which of the regulations you mean but here is a "Copy & Past" from the USA OSHA safety regulations...tnimble":28n920wd said:Its not always that it are the regulatory bodies. Some things are done only because its thought necessary whilst there is no rule demanding that specific thing. Sometimes rules are used without having the conditions to which the rule applies. Sometimes things are just implemented while in the specific situation it makes no sense and no dispensation is asked. Sometimes (especially with changes) rules are vague or their meaning misinterpreted and ill implemented.
Rich":3oczf7im said:Hi Niki, as usual your comments are right, but it's not the regs that need changing but the users common sense, it would appear that in some countries sense is not so common.
regards,
Rich.
In generalNiki":2tbbc3ng said:I don't know which of the regulations you mean...
...but here is a "Copy & Past" from the USA OSHA safety regulations...
...
Interestingly, the USA safety regulation are provided free on the internet but to see the EU safety regulations....you have to pay.... :x
Enter your email address to join: