0809 telephone scam

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Don't know. You could always contact Virgin and ask them.
Whenever I get a number that I don't recognise it goes straight into Google. You can almost be certain that you haven't been the first person to get the same call.
Someone phoned me yesterday asking if I wanted free solar panels (no cost). They then said that they would do a satellite check and phone me back to see if the house was suitable. It took me less than 5 minutes on Google to find out what the catch was. No thanks.
Google is your friend.
 
This one is doing the rounds.

It's not quite a complete hoax, but it is a hoax for all practical purposes.

0xxx (just one zero on the front) will NOT get you an international call here. You might get a premium rate number, but it won't be as the note implies (which has been copied from the Snopes write-up straight into the whocallsme database, by the look of it). Ofcom are now much hotter on that numberspace allocation than they used to be, and will disallow misleading numbers, and anyway, you pay for what you dial, NOT where it gets routed to ultimately. There are variations on this for mobiles, but the general principle holds good, except when 'roaming' abroad with a mobile, when all bets are off!

Have a look at http://countrycode.org/uk. To get an international number from a UK phone used in the UK, you prefix the international dialling code with 00, not a single zero. If you store a full international number in a mobile with "+" at the front, most mobiles will add the 00 automagically (so you don't see it in the phone book). They're not perfect though, and I've had trouble in the USA in the past trying to call back to the UK, when the phone didn't do the international call prefix properly (it's 011 over there). But I digress...

I've just written a rebuttal of this for elderly parents, etc (who get this stuff and worry). The same bit of fiction even turned up in a Surrey C.C. Trading Standards' newsletter last year - try arguing against that!

It beats me why people circulate stuff without doing rudimentary fact checking, especially those who are specifically paid to be exact and to check carefully...

E.
 
Back
Top