Wooden vs Metal planes

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Jelly

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2012
Messages
1,366
Reaction score
338
Location
Sheffield
This may have been done before, but the search function doesn't bring much up.

What are the relative advantages of wooden and metal planes? I use both, but definitely prefer the wooden ones though in part that may be having been lucky to get a decent smoother, jack and try plane to start with. My Faithfull № 4 has been indispensable on this last project (never using purpleheart for fine joinery again!) as it was less of a big deal to sharpen a back-bevel for an increased cutting angle, as I knew the iron was an easily replaceable standard part.

I presume metal planes (especially steel planes, assuming they're not all either bargin basement, or collectable early stanley) would have an advantage for site work.
 
I've a load of both. I keep trying to get the woodies working for me but never for long.
The main advantage of wooden planes is that they are cheap. Good ones on ebay go for £2 or so. Secondly they are lighter and so reduce the actual work necessary.
But in every other respect metal planes are far superior: easy and quicker to adjust precisely, easier and quicker to sharpen, more reliable (don't go out of adjustment).
But I do use one often. It's a 3/4" skew rebate which is really useful - up to the point where the much more adaptable Stanley 78 is called for.
Metal planes have the advantage for site and shop work without a doubt, but you could stick to woodies if you felt you wanted to. To make them viable I think you'd need a lot of them so that you can have them ready, set and sharpened for different uses. But this is possible - I just bought a box of 20 assorted for £40, condition variable from worn out to unused
 
I use both. When I took my City & Guild in 1957 on the tool list to take was a plough to which my parents bought me a Record in metal. Coudnt handle it had to borrow the shop wood plough. What I notice when picking uo a wood plane you can tell if its a good for you. It just fits in your hand and seems to work on its own ie just push it. (it does happen sometimes with metal)
 
Weight. Wooden planes are light, a distinct advantage when there is a lot of hand planing to be done. Try using a No. 6 metal or No. 7 for a lengthy period of time, tea breaks every 5 minutes. The heft of metal planes may be an advantage on harder, difficult grain timber.
 
For bench planes, I think it's like Jacob said; metal planes did actually bring some improvements, most noticeably the ease of setting the iron exactly right for the task in hand. However, to quickly plane 5-10mm off the edge of a board, I will still use a wooden jack plane first (set to take a thick shaving) followed by a fine-set metal plane to ensure a smooth edge. It's the way I learnt at school (where each boy's kit included a wooden jack plane but metal planes were only issued strictly when needed at the end of a project) and it's efficient.

There are several specialist tools where I prefer the wooden models. For example, the wooden moving fillister with its skewed blade is far nicer to use - and quicker - than the 78 / 788 style metal plane. Simple unfenced wooden rebate planes are versatile but can't really stand in for a massive steel or iron shoulder plane.

Once you get to moulding planes there's no competition and it's wood all the way.
 
Each have their good and bad points/merits etc but I honestly believe it comes down to simple personal preference

I have tried several times to get on with wooden planes
unfortunately they are just not for me, I don't like the feel or weight of them
so it would be true to say I don't own any anymore

Sorry LOL

Roger
 
Of course wooden planes are better! The most complex furniture ever made was at a time when almost no iron planes were available. Since the rise of the iron planes, the quality of handtool woodworking has seen a steady decline....

Yes, metal planes are bit easier to use. I've been using woodies almost exclusively the last half year or so, and still find it somewhat easier to adjust a Stanley. The Stanley does have a very slick design. The woodies are much nicer to hold in a cold shop, the woodies glide so much nicer over the wood, and the lighter weight certainly is an advantage (despite modern planemakers claiming otherwise). For me the grip of a woodie foreplane is a lot more comfortable then a metal plane. So overall it's a matter of preference and a bit of practice.
 
I've never used one, I have a wooden rebate plane but its a paperweight for my receipts :)

My no8 record has seen better days and it is tiring to use, I wouldn't mind a go on an ECE jointer with the metal bench plane style adjustment.
 
James-1986":3kpwl9ec said:
I've never used one, I have a wooden rebate plane but its a paperweight for my receipts :)

My no8 record has seen better days and it is tiring to use, I wouldn't mind a go on an ECE jointer with the metal bench plane style adjustment.
Dunno it seems neither fish nor fowl. If you are going retro you might as well do it properly!
I'll keep fiddling with mine - maybe one day they'll reveal their true worth. :shock:
 
Of course...I would be expected to say "why not have both!"

Infills... :mrgreen:

Having said that...moulding planes are definitely better in wood...far better than faffing about with those crazy combination planes.

Jimi
 
Other virtues of wooden planes:
Cheap. Jacob allready mentioned it. Vintage planes can be had for a song.
The old one often have very good irons. Laminated thick blades, easy to sharpen, take a great and durable edge (with a a bit of luck).
They are so easy to tune! Being woodworkers, it's pretty rediculous in fact to spend your time rebuilding metal planes, getting dirty hands in the proces. The caveat of course, they do need quite a bit of tuning. Vintage ones are usually pretty much worn out. Nothing a woodworker can't fix though.
Jointers, up to 30" long are easy to find and a joy to use. Cheap too. Try to lift a 30"iron jointer, if such a one would exist.
You can even make your own planes! The krenov patern is easy and popular and they work great. The traditional pattern is a bit more involved to make, but very doable.

Some not so great things about wooden planes.
Of course setting them takes a bit of practice. A jack or a foreplane is easy and in fact faster to set then a metal plane. The jointer isn't bad either. The fine setting of the smoother is a bit of an art. It helps to not set the wedge too tight, so it easier to move the iron up again with some taps on the back.
Moving wood through the seasons. Yes, they loose the flattness of the sole when the weather changes. You can also see this as a positive thing. The movement of your plane tells you something about all the other wood in the shop. With some fine sandpaper on glass the issue is easilly and quickly resolved though.

When you buy vintage wooden planes, have a look at the latest blog post from the logan cabinet shop. It has some good tips how to repair and tune them: http://logancabinetshoppe.com/blog/2013/02/troubleshooting-wooden-plane-problems/
 
jimi43":w00u5lx5 said:
Of course...I would be expected to say "why not have both!"

Infills... :mrgreen:

Having said that...moulding planes are definitely better in wood...far better than faffing about with those crazy combination planes.

Jimi
OK if you have one for every profile you expect to use, sharp and ready. But they are cheap so this is quite possible I suppose.
I've been using a woody rebate plane lately but the body has warped a bit over the winter. No prob as it's the work of seconds to plane it straight. But then it's going to bend again by mid summer and need straightening again - getting smaller every year!
 
The plane I use the most is a Record #5, nicely tuned for fine, accurate cuts (one might loosely call it a small panel plane).

But many of the planes I prefer using are wooden - skew rebate, moving fillister, mildly cambered jack plane and scrub plane. The blades tend be excellent, and well bedded, and the soles glide far more easily.

Adjusting is not the same as a metal plane, but is an easily acquired skill (there are videos on the web) - the main tip to the ham fisted is - put away the big hammer.

BugBear
 
There is one important item regarding wood planes is that if you own one you are looking after a peice of history to be passed on. Rather give give some TLC than end up on a rubish tip after a house clearance.
 
Jacob":343l4oeb said:
jimi43":343l4oeb said:
Of course...I would be expected to say "why not have both!"

Infills... :mrgreen:

Having said that...moulding planes are definitely better in wood...far better than faffing about with those crazy combination planes.

Jimi
OK if you have one for every profile you expect to use, sharp and ready. But they are cheap so this is quite possible I suppose.
I've been using a woody rebate plane lately but the body has warped a bit over the winter. No prob as it's the work of seconds to plane it straight. But then it's going to bend again by mid summer and need straightening again - getting smaller every year!

I also have a collection of metal drill bits...I find the wooden ones very ineffective..... :wink: :roll:

And you know what Jacob...they cost me more each than each one of my Gabriels.

You just buy the one you want for the job you need when you need it...

Or...you can buy every one you see for the love of the art and the hand that made them and have the added bonus that when you need one to do a job...you have the one you need.

I find this more useful than collecting stamps....

Jim
 
Jelly":1ej8126w said:
This may have been done before, but the search function doesn't bring much up.

What are the relative advantages of wooden and metal planes? I use both, but definitely prefer the wooden ones though in part that may be having been lucky to get a decent smoother, jack and try plane to start with. My Faithfull № 4 has been indispensable on this last project (never using purpleheart for fine joinery again!) as it was less of a big deal to sharpen a back-bevel for an increased cutting angle, as I knew the iron was an easily replaceable standard part.

I presume metal planes (especially steel planes, assuming they're not all either bargin basement, or collectable early stanley) would have an advantage for site work.

From the outside, I find it frustrating British woodworkers generally don't have an appreciation of their wooden plane heritage. In the 18th Century, when British planes were made by a local plane maker rather than by some larger factory the planes were the best ever made. At least I believe they were.

Take for example Rich's post in the thread on the history of left-handed tools:

richarnold":1ej8126w said:
As a lefty, and a lover of vintage tools, this has been a constant struggle over the years, but basically I have just learnt to adapt and use moulding planes and anything handed in the convetional manner with my right hand. The early bench planes had an offset handle and I made a big mistake a year or so ago when I made some copies of an early 18th century design. I forgot to reverse the offset!!. I just couldn't use them at all. I ended up selling them to an American tool dealer.
001-6_zps32281de3.jpg

Rich found 18th Century style planes set up for right-handed use were unusable. I know exactly what he's talking about. But think about that for a minute. The off-set tote (yes, it's an old British term as is rabbet) makes that much difference in the side-to-side balance of the plane that Rich didn't keep those planes he made? It really does make that much difference, you feel like you're fighting the plane the whole time you're using it if the tote is off-set the wrong way.

Here's a question--if the plane makers of the time paid that much attention to the side-to-side balance of the plane, wouldn't they also pay attention to the end-to-end balance?

Given that the balance is most relevant on the return stroke and the return is more than half the work you do with a plane. I learned a long time ago to avoid dragging a tool, other project piece, or anything else across my work. This will leave a burnished scar on the surface that really leaps out on application of stain or surface film finishes. If you're going to avoid these burnished scars unexpectedly leaping out during the finishing process and spoiling the work, you need to develop the habit of never dragging anything across your work through the whole building process.

Can a plane be made so that it's easily lifted off the work with just one hand holding the tote? Yes and it can be made so that it naturally leaves the surface parallel in both the X and Y axis. I don't know of any metal planes made that way and Continental wooden planes are simply awful when it comes to balance. American wooden planes aren't much better than Continental planes.

Here's a 30" 18th Century style British jointer that's balanced the way it can be. It's agile, less tiring and stressful to use, and feels like a natural extension of your arm.

balance.jpg


Here's a photo of an early Stanley 608C that Stanley called a "jointer." No, it's a 24" trying plane as is the wooden plane just behind it and a true jointer just behind them.

jointer.jpg


The Stanley weighs 8 pounds 6 1/2 ounces, the wooden trying plane weighs 5 pounds 11 1/2 ounces, and the 30" jointer weighs 6 pounds 8 ounces. Given the poor balance of the Stanley it feels like it's actually more than twice as heavy as the wooden jointer. After working with planes they way they can be, I now find the Stanley as unusable as Rich found his right-handed planes.

As to adjusting, I find adjusting a wedge-set single iron wooden plane a lot easier and faster than Stanley's adjustment gimmick. Properly made wooden planes will make bench work a lot easier for anyone who's willing to take a few minutes to set them.
 
Great info Larry! I never thought about the balance like that. And you're right, the German jointers (raubank) are awfull. They even look completely out of wack with the handle on their butt. I am a huge fan of the British planes too. The Dutch ones may look very smart, but technically and in quality the British plane are just better.

In The Netherlands offset handles were the norm for a much longer period then in the US of the UK. I have two 30" jointers, I guess from somewhere around the turn of the 19th to 20th century. One is a Nooitgedagt, who started making planes in 1865 and the other has no makers name. The noname one is now my user-jointer. And indeed it is somehow much easier to get a square edge with this plane then with my Stanley #7. I haven't compared with a woodie with centrally placed handle though. I also don't know about the fore-aft balance, will have a look tonight. Thanks for pointing this out.

BTW, no matter how much I practice with my woodies, I still think the Stanleys are easier to adjust to a very fine setting. I am pretty fast now with my smoothing plane, but still... Here is a video on my blog of me sharpening and setting up my wooden smoother: http://seekelot.blogspot.nl/2013/03/sharpening.html. Setting up the plane starts at 4:00. I apologise for using a brass hammer, really need to make a wooden faced one. Anyway, you can see me fiddling quite a bit. It's much quicker now though, after I have been using the wooden planes exclusively for the last half year.

BTW, here you can see my user set of planes at the moment: http://seekelot.blogspot.nl/2012/06/wooden-planes.html
 
I just thought, maybe the continental planes had the mouth so far back, becaue they were originally equiped with a front tote. When you have a front tote the fore aft balance isn't so important, because you have a firm grip on the front. Later the front tote was ommited and now you have to clamp your hand tight around the front to prevent it dropping nose down.

(now, I was really trying to avoid the word tote on this British forum).
 
Corneel":2zgdzyac said:
Anyway, you can see me fiddling quite a bit. It's much quicker now though, after I have been using the wooden planes exclusively for the last half year.

Yeah - the first time I tried it, I thought it was impossible, but some good advice and a little practice made it simple.

BugBear
 
Some pictures to illustrate the difference in balance in 18th century planes versus newer ones:\

A copy of 18th century jackplane. The (offset) handle is almost hitting the iron (not installed here). This plane was made by George Willson in colonial Williamsburg.
IMG_0405_zps31b292c3.jpg


A more recent jackplane from ebay.
T2eC16FHJHoE9n3Kd30TBRRkwDedew60_12_zpsb930e867.jpg


An 18th century dutch jointer. Often these handles were dovetailed into the side of the plane. Here it is in a mortise with drawpins from the side. Handle quite far forward.
P3190019_zps23537ce6.jpg


And a Nooitgedagt copy from the late 19th century. Handle and escapement have been moved back a lot.
P3140012_zps5a04893b.jpg
 

Latest posts

Back
Top