Few thngs:
It's got "Chinese-made" written all over it.
It's the same column as my 'Clarke', with a bigger table. IIRC. It's OK, but the clamp does both height and horizontal movement simultaneously.
Olly had the same issue I had, namely the main shaft bearings, accuracy and concentricity. His went noisy; on mine the shaft isn't very concentric. I doubt this one is better as the main casting looks very similar.
The slowest speed is 140 RPM - that's good and more useful than fast.
Having metal-rod handles is good, as you can remove them when they get in the way (and they will!).
Do you need a 3-phase motor?
It's very heavy and most of that is the table. I wonder if the column is up to carrying it (it's a tube). For woodworking, I'd rather have a lighter weight tilt-able table than a heavy one. One reason is that none of these drills tilt about the table surface, in contrast to the centre of movement of a mitre saw, for example, which is usually very close to the bed surface. Point being, as you tilt it it goes out of balance, which affects the geometry. The table on mine (smaller and circular) can go to vertical (i.e. 90 degrees tilt), and I find this very useful for drilling the edges of boards sometimes
The spec. says 3MT for the quill. Most general purpose drills are 2MT, so you may need an adaptor sleeve for some things. I'd guess the chuck is threaded, rather than Jacobs Taper (JT). The latter is a bit of a nuisance in my experience (something else to work loose).
The 240V versions of these drills have an Edison screw bulbholder in the body, just behind the quill, for a work light. I find that very useful. It doesn't look like this one has that (probably because of cost). I may be wrong though.
The interlocked chuck guard would be a PITA, unless there is some new commercial requirement for one.
Much as I like Axminster, I'd gently suggest that you'd get something really nice secondhand for equivalent money, more so if you are buying 3ph.
Just my £0.02...
