Human rights?

[Digit]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 ... man-rights

"planning authorities … have an obligation under the Human Rights Act 1998 to consider the effects of their decision on the human rights of affected third parties. The right to private and family life prevents not just physical incursions into the home or residence, but also interference from things such as noise, smell, emissions."

Windmills, noisy neighbours, farms, factories, illegal camp sites and raves?

Roy.

 

[Benchwayze]

I take issue with the statement that the prisoners are not 'there by choice'.
Yes they are. They committed a crime, in free choice.
Hard cheese. I have more sympathy for the animals.

Having said that NIMBY please! :twisted:

 

[Digit]

I take issue with the statement that the prisoners are not 'there by choice'.
Yes they are. They committed a crime, in free choice.

Well what else would you expect John, it is from the Guardian? :lol:

Roy.

 

[Benchwayze]

I never gave it a thought Roy :-"

:mrgreen:

 

[Jacob]

Digit, if you are so opposed to human rights have you thought of showing this - perhaps attach a ball & chain to your ankle or something? Show your commitment? Or a manacles protest outside St Pauls?

 

[Digit]

If anybody on here could mis understand the thrust of the post it would be you wouln't it Jacob?

Roy.

 

[Digit]

Here you are Jacob, something else for you to disagree with....

http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16168691

...the 'inhumane/uncivilised/ blah blah blah' Ozzies can get shot of 'em, why can't we?

Roy.

 

[Noel]

Thread closed. Issue is too divisive.