• We invite you to join UKWorkshop.
    Members can turn off viewing Ads!

Homemade cyclone dust collector collapsing

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

Cooper

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2016
Messages
110
Reaction score
54
Location
Bromley Kent
Inspired by a coment by Fester. I had a go at making one using a fermentation bin, I had lying around. It worked brilliantly until the hose blocked, the bin collapsed spliting down one side. I sealed the split, inside and out with gaffer tape and pushed on old builders bucket into the bin to reinforce it. I cut a 30mm hole in the lid for a pressure release valve which I knocked up from ply with a scrap spring, using a bit of foam wallpaper underlay as a seal. It works fine now collecting dust from the lathe but when I want to vacuum shavings I get blockages in the hose, which came from a scrapped Dyson. I used 1 1/4" PVC waste pipe and connectors that I had for the connections. This is really too narrow and shavings can easily build up and block the hose. All this said I'm really pleased with it as its capacity is twice that of the Henry which drives it and much easier to empty. The pressure release doesn't leak but works when the hose is blocked. If I were to make it again, had a different hose and 1 1/2" fittings I think it would be much better.
 

paulrbarnard

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2017
Messages
335
Reaction score
275
Location
Shepton Mallet, UK
Inspired by a coment by Fester. I had a go at making one using a fermentation bin, I had lying around. It worked brilliantly until the hose blocked, the bin collapsed spliting down one side. I sealed the split, inside and out with gaffer tape and pushed on old builders bucket into the bin to reinforce it. I cut a 30mm hole in the lid for a pressure release valve which I knocked up from ply with a scrap spring, using a bit of foam wallpaper underlay as a seal. It works fine now collecting dust from the lathe but when I want to vacuum shavings I get blockages in the hose, which came from a scrapped Dyson. I used 1 1/4" PVC waste pipe and connectors that I had for the connections. This is really too narrow and shavings can easily build up and block the hose. All this said I'm really pleased with it as its capacity is twice that of the Henry which drives it and much easier to empty. The pressure release doesn't leak but works when the hose is blocked. If I were to make it again, had a different hose and 1 1/2" fittings I think it would be much better.
I have a realy puny bin from the local HW store on mine and just put some internal bracing in it. Does the job pretty well.
tempImagez0z7u4.jpg
 

Robbo3

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2012
Messages
2,131
Reaction score
201
Location
Oxfordshire
I said that putting a PRV to stop container collapse is a bad cludge, poor design, bad choice, and shows that who ever puts one in is badly advised or incompetent.

putting in a PRV to stop a suck device
getting damaged from too low/no airflow is a completely different situation and an appropriate use of a PRV but placement of a PRV in the catchment bin is wrong and those advocating that are either uneducated or lazy. Correct placement, if you have a need to add a PRV, is upstream of the cyclone.

Note LPHV systems are completely different and nothing to do with the present topic (sure the both suck dust)
I stand by my original post as you have just argued two opposites.
End of discussion for me as you are now personalising it.
 

Sachakins

You can agree or you can be wrong...
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
306
Reaction score
190
Location
Liverpool
And the PRV is in the right place between the cyclone and the vac not in the dust bin.
Yep, that's why I always show this video for cyclone queries, very good solution. If you really want to delve into dust extractor, cyclone, impeller and motor sizing, then search for Bill Pentz, he takes it to a whole new level.
 

sometimewoodworker

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2008
Messages
811
Reaction score
121
Location
Watford, Non S-At, Udon Thailand
Yep, that's why I always show this video for cyclone queries, very good solution. If you really want to delve into dust extractor, cyclone, impeller and motor sizing, then search for Bill Pentz, he takes it to a whole new level.
I hadn’t watched the video when you first posted it. The design is good to excellent. The only improvements I could see making would be to use smooth internal flexible pipe and if possible (it isn’t if you need the smallest footprint) reduce the number of right angle bends.

The design has covered almost every point. Bill Pentz’s site is here and was the one I used together with a Clear Vue Mini that is referenced from there when I got my cyclone. I didn’t need to build in a PRV into the first drum as I put reenforcement in.

I may well get a big drum, if I do it will either be an oil drum or I will add enough reenforcement to a plastic drum.
 

TominDales

Established Member
Joined
21 Jan 2021
Messages
157
Reaction score
111
Location
Ripon
Hello,
I have a 1.5hp Charnwood w680 dust collector which is then connected to my cyclone seperator. This is via a 2.5m flexible hose from extract to cyclone it is 50mm diameter. The cyclone is connected to a 220litre plastic barrel with screw on airtight lid. The cyclone then feeds out to a 50mm 2.5m flexible hose which is then positioned near my lathe. Everytime I turn on the extractor the barrel starts to collapse under the pressure/ suction?? Any help? Is the cyclone too small or flexible hose to narrow?
Hi Moller,
I hope we haven't confused you with a blizzard of replies, dust collection seems to be a hot topic on this forum. To summarise some of the replies and add in some of my own observations to put it all in perspective.

You are right to assume the cause is due to the small cyclone with narrow flex hose leading from it, however the large barrel is also a bit weak so prone to collapse. As others have pointed out. the W680 is quite a powerful collector with a wide pipe (ca 4''?) so throttling down to 2'' at the cyclone will lead to a pressure drop in the cyclone and barrel causing it to collapse.

There are a number of solutions, in order of simplicity.

1. Fortify the barrel
The simplest is to fortify the barrel or replace it with a stronger and smaller tin one. That will probably do what you want.

2. wider pipes
Your narrow pipes reduce the efficiency of dust collection. Although the narrow pipes force the air to move faster, which is good if you want that kind of vacuum cleaner suck (fast air through narrow hole), overall there will be less air flow, as the air flowing in narrow pipe experiences a lot more drag from friction of the air over the narrow pipework. If you find you need more suck at your lathe then you may want to increase the pipe diameter to equal that of the W680 port and replace the cyclone with one with wider ports or buy something like this to turn your barrel into a Thein type cyclone Cyclone Dust Collector Kit | Next Day Delivery
This is a much bigger change, so only worth doing if you need the extra suction.

3. Pressure relief valves
Lots of debate on the virtues of PRVs
A pressure relief value PRV is great for protecting against occasional one-off events, typically when a pipe gets blocked and will save a dust collector from imploding when that happens, it also relieves strain on the vacs motor (actually it protects from the motor overhearing - thanks DBT85). The vac could get blocked by shavings or inadvertently closing a blast gate etc the PRV opens and relives the pressure when an ABNORMAL EVENT occurs.

However the problem you described of the barrel collapsing under NORMAL operation is a design problem, the system is constantly pulling a vacuum and pulling-in the barrel. A PRV wont be helpful in this case, it will end up being permanently open, so reducing the effectiveness of your dust extractor. The solution is as referred too above is to strengthen the barrel or increase the pipe diameter.
However a PRV is a good safety feature. As some have commented the proper place for it is as close to the motor as possible, that way it protects all the upstream pipework and barrel. However it is often convenient to fix it to the top of the barrel - practicle flat surface to mount it, as pointed out by 'Sometime wood worker' once it is triggered it will reduce the effect of the cyclone, but if its only purpose is as safety relief used once in a while that's ok. If you plan to use the value to add in bypass air, then its best fitted downstream as near to the motor as possible, as shown in one of the YouTube clips.
Personally I regard the PRV as primarily a safety feature that will protect the motor and pipework from an abnormal event, when the pipe gets blocked. But that's my preference

I hope that is clear summary of what has gone before - this topic seems to attract a lot of heated agreement which is confusing. Let me know if you need a further explanation. Best wishes Tom
 
Top