Random Orbital Bob
Established Member
Is it right to assert that spindle blanks are more forgiving than bowl blanks in the splitting department? In general, I find that branch wood turned green tends to a) keep its shape better and b) split a little less than bowl blanks.
I'm conscious this is really generalising here because I've had plenty of branchwood that's split right down the core (holly, laurel, eucalyptus ie the usual suspects). Equally, I've had plenty of oak, chestnut and birch that has been better behaved.
As I understand it the majority of shrinkage (and therefore splitting stress) occurs perpendicular to the direction of the grain. Is this correct? In a log form would this be the cause of radial cracking? If that is true then a bowl blank at say 9" by 2" will have a huge surface area of grain exposed across which it will want to shrink will it not? Whereas a 3"x3" spindle blank has less cross grain shrinkage potential.
So is that why, spindle blanks that I've harvested about 6 months ago and are on the drying journey (sealed ends, air drying), but by no means dry ,seem to survive cracking once turned better than bowls with a similar drying history?
I appreciate rough turning bowls is the answer to faster drying. This is a more generic question about spindle drying.
Along the same lines, branchwood literally picked up off the ground and perhaps with spalting well underway, would necessarily be more dry than greenwood would it not? (Assuming it had been down for a few years and also assuming equal thickness)
What I'm saying is is it possible to harvest dead branchwood and cut out a good few years of the drying time?
I'm conscious this is really generalising here because I've had plenty of branchwood that's split right down the core (holly, laurel, eucalyptus ie the usual suspects). Equally, I've had plenty of oak, chestnut and birch that has been better behaved.
As I understand it the majority of shrinkage (and therefore splitting stress) occurs perpendicular to the direction of the grain. Is this correct? In a log form would this be the cause of radial cracking? If that is true then a bowl blank at say 9" by 2" will have a huge surface area of grain exposed across which it will want to shrink will it not? Whereas a 3"x3" spindle blank has less cross grain shrinkage potential.
So is that why, spindle blanks that I've harvested about 6 months ago and are on the drying journey (sealed ends, air drying), but by no means dry ,seem to survive cracking once turned better than bowls with a similar drying history?
I appreciate rough turning bowls is the answer to faster drying. This is a more generic question about spindle drying.
Along the same lines, branchwood literally picked up off the ground and perhaps with spalting well underway, would necessarily be more dry than greenwood would it not? (Assuming it had been down for a few years and also assuming equal thickness)
What I'm saying is is it possible to harvest dead branchwood and cut out a good few years of the drying time?