I've never seen a drawbored double tenon- The original link showed the legs with pegs through the joint.marcus":3t62ryzk said:I restore a fair bit of antique furniture, and this type of table in Edwardian times would have had a spigot turned on the legs, a hole drilled in the cross pieces and then glued and wedged. This lasts for a hundred years, so is pretty tough and easy to make.
It will probably last, but at that thickness it will leave scope for the shoulders to open over time, which is unsightly if nothing else. Most antique furniture (and I speak as a fan) was built to fairly indifferent standards, same as today, and for the same reasons — cabinet makers wanted to make money, and most customers had other things to spend their money on and were more interested in being fashionable than in quality. Everyday antique furniture in no way represents some sort of golden age of quality.
So yes, it will probably stay together like that (as it would if it were a single tenon), and that may be fine for your purposes, but if you want to do the best quality job, double tenons are the way to go....
Looking forward to seeing the pics...
I've never seen a double tenon being used for this purpose either, and i don't agree that there is going to be enough structural movement in good seasoned timber that a double tenon is necessary. It's just a waste of time, although good practice for joint cutting if that's what you want.
As goes a turned tenon- on a square section as the original link, then a turned tenon would very rarely have been used, it would have been a wedged through Mortice and Tenon and sometimes pegged/drawbored depending on the period. Had the legs have been a turned section then yes, they may well have had turned tenons.