As I understand it, you want to make a "negative" of your original keeper - a hole exactly the same size as its shape.
It needs a pair of guide bushes and a pair of cutters of different sizes. I remember Ron Fox talking about this in years past (you might still find his videos on the Wealden site). There are limitations, which I'll get to below, but anyway, roughly, it's this:
To calculate the combinations you need, there is a
very simple formula. Use either the diameters or the radii of the cutters, but be consistent (always radii or always diameters).
Bush2 = Bush1 + Cutter1 + Cutter2
The first pass, running round the outside of your original piece, uses Bush1 and Cutter1. The second pass, round the inside of your template, uses Bush2 and Cutter2. Obviously, the bushes will always be bigger than the cutters (as the cutters fit inside them).
The trick is to make that work with cutters and bushes that you actually have, and you'll probably need a complete set of bushes for that reason!
There is another issue with this though: accuracy.
Imagine you're cutting a circular hole, using a hollow circular template. You run the guide bush round the circle, making a smaller hole inside. Any mistakes can only happen into the waste material in the middle. If you twitch (and I do!), you make a bump in the circumference of your wanted hole, which you can remove by making a cleanup pass with the router.
If you're cutting round the outside of a shape, the same thing applies - mistakes go into the waste material.
But making a template this way is VERY difficult: mistakes will go into the final, wanted surface. You might minimise this by using a slightly smaller Cutter1 first (followed by the correct Cutter1) so that you are taking off a small amount of material to get to the finished shape, but any mistake will still translate finally into a bump in your wanted negative shape.
The other issue is the radii of your curved keeper: in order to follow that curve properly, Cutter2 must be smaller than the curves you want to follow. If it's bigger you will get the radius of Cutter2, not the curve. And in any case, you'll get the Cutter2 radius where you have square corners (so you'll have to square those off by hand).
Hope that helps.
E.
By the way, what is a "keeper" in this context? I don't recognise the thing from the picture