dicktimber":1cc0awjt said:
Argee,
The problem with what you say is.... How do you know what a good quality item is today? You say you spend more for the best quality, but what is the best quality....especially saw blade?
most of them are made in China.... Who controls quality there?
I don't see the problem with what I said. Perhaps you have examples of good cheap saw blades? I've never been able to buy one that was both good quality
and cheap - the two do not go together, end of story. You might be lucky to get an
offer, but your search is likely to be fruitless, unless you want throw-away, frequently-replaced stuff - false economy long-term anyway.
The point I was trying to make - which seemed obvious to me - was that you should not compromise safety by making price the main factor. I
know what a good quality item is, because I've had the experience of using both good and bad - and I know which I prefer. For example, CMT (my blade of choice for many years) uses the best raw materials - super 42-44 Rockwell hardened steel from Germany and Cerametal micrograin carbide. Using the best materials is a very good start to making a good quality blade. I'm not a metallurgist, I've got no connection with CMT, but it seems commonsense to me.
Quality control is a matter for the individual company and is not dependent on the manufacturing location - a car made in Chekoslovakia, with QC carried out locally by Germans, was a recent "Car of the Year." Some expensive and well-regarded brands are outsourced to the Far East and China nowadays, not always to their detriment.
dicktimber":1cc0awjt said:
So, that saw blade wizzin' round counts for nothing, whatever you have printed on it's face.
That's nonsense. You (mostly) get what you pay for and
I'm happy to pay for CMT blades.
Ray