Eric The Viking
Established Member
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 6,599
- Reaction score
- 76
Give me a truly nasty and boring task and my mind wanders.
The skirtings are only just Edwardian, probably 1905 or thereabouts, but they're 9" tall with about 5" being horribly intricate mouldings..
Yup I'm hot-air stripping paint off metres (feet) of skirtings. I'm doing it out in the fresh air, as it's mostly lead paint, using a low heat, and catching all the little flakes so they don't reach the veg patch.
So I finished the first one, and took it back upstairs thinking, "I'm sure it was a lot heaver than this when I took it outside. Must be the paint." It was only a short one, about 2.5m, and I've been collecting the burned off paint in one of those big floppy builders' buckets. It didn't feel especially heavy.
So now, days later, I've finished the third one (only one more to go, yippee!), and the bucket has definite mass to it. I've now done two long ones (about 4.2m) and the stripped ones are very obviously lighter in weight than the painted ones.
Before starting the last one I got the D.C.'s digital bathroom scales out onto the trestles (sssh! She doesn't know). Here's the scores:
Unstripped one: 4240mm, 10.1kg
Stripped one: 4410mm, 7.6kg
So the painted one is approx 2.38kg/m, whereas the stripped off one is only 1.72kg/m. That's around 0.66kg/m of paint!
Space shuttle? Its external fuel tank (the big sausage strapped to it at launch) was originally a bright white colour. Some bright lad at Lockheed Martin, who made the tank, realised that, if they didn't paint it but left it the natural foam colour (yellowy-brown), it could be a lot lighter in weight at launch. This meant either fuel saved or a bigger payload than previously possible.
According to Wikipedia, the weight saved was a surprising 272kg. And the Shuttle's tank only had one special anti-UV coat, not the seven layers of (mostly) lead paint on my skirtings!
Makes one think.
E.
PS: I'll weigh the bucket of scraped off gunge at the end of the job too, just to see.
The skirtings are only just Edwardian, probably 1905 or thereabouts, but they're 9" tall with about 5" being horribly intricate mouldings..
Yup I'm hot-air stripping paint off metres (feet) of skirtings. I'm doing it out in the fresh air, as it's mostly lead paint, using a low heat, and catching all the little flakes so they don't reach the veg patch.
So I finished the first one, and took it back upstairs thinking, "I'm sure it was a lot heaver than this when I took it outside. Must be the paint." It was only a short one, about 2.5m, and I've been collecting the burned off paint in one of those big floppy builders' buckets. It didn't feel especially heavy.
So now, days later, I've finished the third one (only one more to go, yippee!), and the bucket has definite mass to it. I've now done two long ones (about 4.2m) and the stripped ones are very obviously lighter in weight than the painted ones.
Before starting the last one I got the D.C.'s digital bathroom scales out onto the trestles (sssh! She doesn't know). Here's the scores:
Unstripped one: 4240mm, 10.1kg
Stripped one: 4410mm, 7.6kg
So the painted one is approx 2.38kg/m, whereas the stripped off one is only 1.72kg/m. That's around 0.66kg/m of paint!
Space shuttle? Its external fuel tank (the big sausage strapped to it at launch) was originally a bright white colour. Some bright lad at Lockheed Martin, who made the tank, realised that, if they didn't paint it but left it the natural foam colour (yellowy-brown), it could be a lot lighter in weight at launch. This meant either fuel saved or a bigger payload than previously possible.
According to Wikipedia, the weight saved was a surprising 272kg. And the Shuttle's tank only had one special anti-UV coat, not the seven layers of (mostly) lead paint on my skirtings!
Makes one think.
E.
PS: I'll weigh the bucket of scraped off gunge at the end of the job too, just to see.