I don't think so......... I am only really interested in why on earth you feel the need? This is what I don't get and have asked you?
Why did I comment? You asked for comments.
I didn't ask why you commented and I like that it drew you're intention enough to comment, again I only really wonder(as stated more than once) why you feel the need??
I commented on both the appearance of the piece, and how well it represents your intended meaning. In order to express my opinion, I quoted from your intended meaning. I'm not entirely clear on how I could have expressed my opinion without so doing. This is such a normal part of academic criticism there's even a special provision in copyright law for it, it's not like I did something odd.
Why did I go to your blog to read your meaning? Your post specifically invited people to.
BugBear
Hmmm, I'm starting to think you are not reading my responses to you properly. I have no where asked you why you read my blog, I'm again happy you did. I asked why you copied and pasted text from it out of context. The words you lifted from my blog were only a description of the meaning of the cage part(as I have already said) and posting them as you did saying "I don't see it in there" is, as I already said pointless as without the parts explaining the rest, it is obvious it will not make sense.
I really don't understand why you have taken exception, not to the work but just because I have given the reasons behind it? Why do you feel the need???