Benchwayze
Established Member
I suppose as an Englishman, I should be ashamed to say I don't know, but then I've never been a cricketeer. So is Switching, the same as in baseball, when facing a left-hand delivery; the batsman choosing to bat left handed too? (If he/she can?)
Or is it summat to do with the stumps the batsman decided to defend, when he took his guard (or whatever they call it) and changing it in mid-over?
Surely, if a batsman is ambidextrous, the bowler should know about it, so hard cheese. Live with it!
And as for throwing the ball! Well... Really. It's just not cricket is it?
(Despite being in complete ignorance of the more arcane rules of cricket, I do know a throw as opposed to a proper delivery!)
And if Ronnie O'Sullivan can get away with switch-cueing, and a bowler can 'hide the seam' or send down Yorkers or full-tosses at a moment's notice, why can't a batting person use switch-hitting at will?
We're going to lose anyway.
Oh please roll on Wimbledon, so I can switch off the TV!
8)
Or is it summat to do with the stumps the batsman decided to defend, when he took his guard (or whatever they call it) and changing it in mid-over?
Surely, if a batsman is ambidextrous, the bowler should know about it, so hard cheese. Live with it!
And as for throwing the ball! Well... Really. It's just not cricket is it?
(Despite being in complete ignorance of the more arcane rules of cricket, I do know a throw as opposed to a proper delivery!)
And if Ronnie O'Sullivan can get away with switch-cueing, and a bowler can 'hide the seam' or send down Yorkers or full-tosses at a moment's notice, why can't a batting person use switch-hitting at will?
We're going to lose anyway.
Oh please roll on Wimbledon, so I can switch off the TV!
8)