Despite being taught to use light oil to lubricate the rubber, I always thought it strange to introduce a substance so incompatible with shellac and meths. Having read elsewhere that oil is not necessary, I tried this for myself, quickly agreed and have never used it since.
However I've long wondered how this idea, which seems to be the standard received wisdom on the subject, came about. My guess is that in the days when French polish was the standard finish for most furniture and carried out on an industrial scale, it was realised that lubricating the rubber speeds the process up. Since I only French polish occasionally and rarely on large areas, I can afford to take it a bit slower and avoid oil, which has the potential to cause problems and must, of course, be removed at the end anyway.
Any thoughts?
However I've long wondered how this idea, which seems to be the standard received wisdom on the subject, came about. My guess is that in the days when French polish was the standard finish for most furniture and carried out on an industrial scale, it was realised that lubricating the rubber speeds the process up. Since I only French polish occasionally and rarely on large areas, I can afford to take it a bit slower and avoid oil, which has the potential to cause problems and must, of course, be removed at the end anyway.
Any thoughts?