templecarpentry
Established Member
Hi all,
I have an EHL65 festool planer, and i just want to vent some anger about their stupid single twist blade design. Its come to a point that i am considering getting rid of the machine and going for another make.
The blade replacement costs about £13 depending where you shop, is non reversible and in my eyes creates a problem for all users. One chip from an offending piece of hidden staple in a door, and the new blade is wasted. Only to have no other option but to buy another festool blade at a silly price as there is no reversal option, only for the blade to no doubt become damaged again soon. Obviously shoddy door mass production is to blame for the hidden metalwork, but that is not my point.
Why did festool think it was a good idea to isolate their users into only one option of blade??? Surely if they had a head on the planer that took standard or mainstream planer blades, this would allow much more ease of use and satisfaction for the inevitable damage that often occurs, thus presenting the end user with a more disposable option rather than a precious single blade which drains the pocket?
Any opinions are welcome. Its just driving me mad, i havent got time to keep hunting for blades at short notice. (Yes i keep a spare)
P
I have an EHL65 festool planer, and i just want to vent some anger about their stupid single twist blade design. Its come to a point that i am considering getting rid of the machine and going for another make.
The blade replacement costs about £13 depending where you shop, is non reversible and in my eyes creates a problem for all users. One chip from an offending piece of hidden staple in a door, and the new blade is wasted. Only to have no other option but to buy another festool blade at a silly price as there is no reversal option, only for the blade to no doubt become damaged again soon. Obviously shoddy door mass production is to blame for the hidden metalwork, but that is not my point.
Why did festool think it was a good idea to isolate their users into only one option of blade??? Surely if they had a head on the planer that took standard or mainstream planer blades, this would allow much more ease of use and satisfaction for the inevitable damage that often occurs, thus presenting the end user with a more disposable option rather than a precious single blade which drains the pocket?
Any opinions are welcome. Its just driving me mad, i havent got time to keep hunting for blades at short notice. (Yes i keep a spare)
P