That’s an interesting view point just because it took a week to travel between the U.K. and USA doesn’t stop an infection travelling between the countries!seems odd that the UK and the US would both suffer from the same flu epidemic, I'm assuming that the majority of travel would be by boat so you wouldn't have thought it would happen in both places at the same time?
To be expected due to a combination of what is being measured (deaths compared to average over past five) and the nature of what is being measured (deaths... yet to be established but it’s a fair bet to say whatever event it was knocked out the vulnerable so they aren’t there to knock out the following year).Then drops into a 'better than normal' year almost instantly.
Don’t get wrapped around the axle with graphs shown on the media - go to the Gov.uk website and look at the raw data. I never bother with deaths data it does not tell you anything (if you take the emotion out) that data is a done deal. The data on hospital admissions/ICU beds/patients on mechanical ventilation are the key ones.I have just been watching tonight‘s news on the BBC with very similar graphs of deaths and I am extremely sceptical, but are they any worse than any other news organisation? They all love to exaggerate.
They based their graphs on a previous five year average, I can guarantee that showed what they wanted to show.
That would be the great influenza epidemic of 1928-1929. A sort of second wave of Spanish flu of earlier, then penicillin waS discovered in 1929-30 I believe.so, highest excess deaths since WW2 according to the BBC today, horrible, but not unexpected. They showed a chart showing spikes in the first and second world war, understandable, what I can't understand is a slightly smaller, but still significant spike around 1928. Can anyone explain this? My first thought was Spanish flue, but I think that was around 1918 / 1919. included the chart from the bbc site (doesn't show WW1 but did on TV earlier). All history lessons gratefully recieved
View attachment 100780
A week? I thought boat travel between the UK and US was a good month, maybe I'm way off on that, one of those ideas that stick in your mind as facts and don't get challanged.That’s an interesting view point just because it took a week to travel between the U.K. and USA doesn’t stop an infection travelling between the countries!
From the graph, in 1928 it took around 5 days.I think I was definately wrong on my idea that it would have taken a month (in fact I was thinking it probably took longer), working backwards from this graph, it maybe 20 days.
Slightly less is the fastest time but the less expensive ships would probably have been quite a bit slowerFrom the graph, in 1928 it took around 5 days.
but 5 days or a week neither will stop fluBy the early 20th century (1907), the liner Mauretania with a capacity of 2,300 passengers, was able to cross the Atlantic in 4.5 days