Benchwayze
Established Member
Shultzy":3na79oa6 said:
That's why I convert all my money to copper. :lol:
(Although, the newest 'copper' coins here are not copper any more, because they do respond to a magnet.) :wink:
Recycling and recycled 'Council Tax Bands'.
- Thread starter Benchwayze
- Start date
Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:
That's why I convert all my money to copper. :lol:
(Although, the newest 'copper' coins here are not copper any more, because they do respond to a magnet.) :wink:
cambournepete
Established Member
The value of your house as it was or would have been in 1991 hasn't changed though, so your band hasn't changed, so your council tax keeps going up.Benchwayze":21ftrsvi said:
Benchwayze
Established Member
Pete,
Now you are making as much sense as the Council.
At least you aren't charging me for it! :lol:
Cheers
John
Now you are making as much sense as the Council.
At least you aren't charging me for it! :lol:
Cheers
John
Jenx
Established Member
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2007
- Messages
- 1,978
- Reaction score
- 0
Odd this, coming from me.. the perennial critic of the 'greenie-guff' ... but the truth of that is actually that I agree totally with conserving resources and energy wherever possible,
anyway.. I digress ... I heard this idea on the radio the other day, and it makes a lot of sense to me...
It follows on from the 'Parliament / Buck House 24/7 Lighting' post earlier ... and concerns road lighting.. the miles upon miles upon miles of road lighting ... The idea posed, was to turn off every Second ( or possibly third ) light that illuminates the miles of motorway / Dual carriageway, thus cutting the energy consumption dramatically.
To me, that makes sense.
Hope I don't cause poor Mike Garnham to choke on his coffee.. but that kind of 'conservation / Green thinking' seems to me to be a very good idea indeed. ( Sorry Mike, :wink:
8) )
I share the same doubts and criticisms of some of the 'lip-service' measures, which, as we seem to hear about all too often are just plain daft.. sending 'nasties' over to China etc for processing, at huge costs on many levels .... but for certain, there must be similar moves that can be made, like the road lighting idea.. that kind of thinking makes perfect logic.
Very difficult to argue with that kind of thinking :wink:
anyway.. I digress ... I heard this idea on the radio the other day, and it makes a lot of sense to me...
It follows on from the 'Parliament / Buck House 24/7 Lighting' post earlier ... and concerns road lighting.. the miles upon miles upon miles of road lighting ... The idea posed, was to turn off every Second ( or possibly third ) light that illuminates the miles of motorway / Dual carriageway, thus cutting the energy consumption dramatically.
To me, that makes sense.
Hope I don't cause poor Mike Garnham to choke on his coffee.. but that kind of 'conservation / Green thinking' seems to me to be a very good idea indeed. ( Sorry Mike, :wink:
8) )I share the same doubts and criticisms of some of the 'lip-service' measures, which, as we seem to hear about all too often are just plain daft.. sending 'nasties' over to China etc for processing, at huge costs on many levels .... but for certain, there must be similar moves that can be made, like the road lighting idea.. that kind of thinking makes perfect logic.
Very difficult to argue with that kind of thinking :wink:
