Eric The Viking
Established Member
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 6,599
- Reaction score
- 76
I've just reported a junk call via the ICO's web site. Normally I wouldn't bother, but this one, selling large-button 'phones to the elderly, was potentially intimidating and even a bit menacing.
After filling-in the form, I found a page of stats on what the ICO is doing about nuisance calls. Initially, I thought, "that looks like they're busy." but on reflection I think it's a lot more puffed-up than them actually getting to grips with the problem.
I was wondering how many search and seizure operations they've undertaken, and how seriously some of the persistent offenders are punished (if at all). There are 'green flags' against some of the big fish, which the ICO would have you believe means they've mended their ways and thus that legal sanctions are unnecessary. There are some surprising names on there, too.
They've fined one company 80,000 quid recently. They don't say if the fine was paid. They also list Ladbrokes as a company that has "improved" its behaviour. 80,000 looked like a big fine, until I realised what Ladbrokes gambling turnover must be -- huge.
So I wonder if any of these crooks are taking the ICO seriously.
E. (who can't be the only one interrupted when in the middle of glueing things, sharpening stuff, etc.)
After filling-in the form, I found a page of stats on what the ICO is doing about nuisance calls. Initially, I thought, "that looks like they're busy." but on reflection I think it's a lot more puffed-up than them actually getting to grips with the problem.
I was wondering how many search and seizure operations they've undertaken, and how seriously some of the persistent offenders are punished (if at all). There are 'green flags' against some of the big fish, which the ICO would have you believe means they've mended their ways and thus that legal sanctions are unnecessary. There are some surprising names on there, too.
They've fined one company 80,000 quid recently. They don't say if the fine was paid. They also list Ladbrokes as a company that has "improved" its behaviour. 80,000 looked like a big fine, until I realised what Ladbrokes gambling turnover must be -- huge.
So I wonder if any of these crooks are taking the ICO seriously.
E. (who can't be the only one interrupted when in the middle of glueing things, sharpening stuff, etc.)