Jacob":1ixs5q60 said:
It usually tends to balance itself roughly in the middle. You just have to hold it down in that position as you pass it over the cutters.
Out of interest, what is the particular advantage to starting it convex-down as opposed to concave-down - just that it's easier to balance the board and find the right 'flat' to plane, where starting concave-down would potentially make inefficient use of the board if the bend is all up one end?
It seems to me that - presuming you wanted to plane with concavity down for stability reasons - the only advantage that the 'dropping on' method described above has over just using the planer normally with the concavity down is that you can adjust how much you plane off each end; so if you have a mostly-straight board with a kink right at the end you can plane that kink down in particular rather than making a long, thin wedge out of the straighter bit.
In cases where one side is significantly more bent than the other I generally manage that fine (concavity down) by planing normally from the end to the point where the cutter no longer engages, lifting the timber
up a bit - under the guard - by pivoting off the end of the table (which seems to me inherently less dangerous than dropping on, correct me if I'm wrong!) and pulling back over the cutter for another pass on that end. Repeat as many times as necessary to balance one end with the other, then plane full-length as normal.
(Instinct suggests to me that there's no reason you shouldn't be able to reliably plane boards up to twice the length of your planer bed, although I'd have to think about it more to be sure!)