John Brown
Freeloading Social media influenza
Because the wind and sun don't always coincide with demand.Why would you want to put charge into the grid from the vehicle? Doesn't seem to make sense? Just stock market type jockeying?
Because the wind and sun don't always coincide with demand.Why would you want to put charge into the grid from the vehicle? Doesn't seem to make sense? Just stock market type jockeying?
At first glance it looks stupid doesn't it. The issue is peak demand. The actual total amount supplied doesn't need to be that big, but it needs to be available immediately. It's the classic kettles on in the Eastenders ad break scenario. Grid demand 5.30-9.30 is where most of the coal and gas generation is used and they spin some of it up just in case as it takes an appreciable number of seconds to be drawable. In contrast, EV's can dump instantaneously, they are just a big battery with a 7kW pipe so if the National Grid know they have that as peaker backup, they don't need to spin up the gas/coal power station. 150k EV's at 7kW is a Gigawatt of instantaneous supply if I've done my maths right (corrections welcomed!). So say Ratcliffe Nottingham coal plant (2Gigawatts) could be needed far less often if 300k EV's were signed up to Vehicle to Grid.Why would you want to put charge into the grid from the vehicle? Doesn't seem to make sense? Just stock market type jockeying?
Why would you want to put charge into the grid from the vehicle? Doesn't seem to make sense? Just stock market type jockeying?
You say in 1 sentence what I took an essay to say - thank you!It is difficult to store wind and solar. Batteries can be used for short term smoothing in demand. If the unwanted renewable energy can be used to charge you car at night it will be cheaper than the electricity during the day when everybody is working cooking etc.
I think both approaches are best. My reply may lack substance to some.You say in 1 sentence what I took an essay to say - thank you!
The depreciation will be negligible compared to use to drive - this is not the main supply to the grid - 19kW/week is an 80 mile drive. The last generation of batteries are doing far far in excess of expectations mine is 5yrs old, 100k miles and barely dented the range, there are some that are on million miles plus. The current generation are way cheaper and better and still improving fast.Do the math on the actual pence per KWh depreciation of a Lithium car battery.
It makes no sense at all to allow the grid to lean on your car battery and pay you a pittance compared to the cost of depreciation.
The only winners are the Electricity Retailers and a few people with EV leases who won't have to care about the state of the battery when they hand the car back.
If grid support becomes even slightly popular watch it (i) get written into lease contracts that you're not allowed to do it and (ii) cars be modified so that they can't do it without it being logged in the diagnostics.
Inclined to agree. EVs more like fiddling while Rome burns.I can't reel off figures, but if you believe climate change is a reality, then "the maths" starts to become irrelevant.
If they were hybrids and had the potential to plug in then they could in effect become a generator which if left running could provide energy into the grid which you could get paid for, whether the cost of fuel outweighs the feedin tarif is another matter!Why would you want to put charge into the grid from the vehicle? Doesn't seem to make sense? Just stock market type jockeying?
Not as simple as that, you cannot just take a new supply off an existing board without checking the total existing loads, it is not an infinate supply of power and could well be on it's limits even taking diversity into account.They run a dedicated 30A 12mm cable from the board to the Charger as they install it.
Cars release about 25% of the CO2 in the UK.Inclined to agree. EVs more like fiddling while Rome burns.
I think it's questionable whether we would be able to afford the luxury of personal EVs if we ever get to the point of 100% green electricity.Cars release about 25% of the CO2 in the UK.
If half those with off street parking charged their EVs with "Economy 7" from unwanted wind at night that would reduce emissions by 6%.
To meet those rapid high demands we have to thank the welsh, they have a big sort of hydro power plant at Dinorwig. Those turbines can spin up in less than a minute to meet sudden demands on the grid.It's the classic kettles on in the Eastenders ad break scenario.
Or peeing in the ocean to see how far it will rise, but yes when we see how much coal is being mined in Australia and the states and how much coal is still being used to generate power then even the UK's closure of all coal fired power stations and with everyone using EV's would make zero difference. To fix a massive problem requires a massive effort and change and not just nibblng round the edges.Inclined to agree. EVs more like fiddling while Rome burns.
If they were hybrids and had the potential to plug in then they could in effect become a generator which if left running could provide energy into the grid which you could get paid for, whether the cost of fuel outweighs the feedin tarif is another matter!
But for a pure EV that you have paid to charge then why would you give it back and make your vehicle unusable until recharged, yes as Dave has said it makes no sense.
Perhaps in the future a new excuse for being late for work will be " sorry my car had not charged in time" or " sorry someone stole my charging cable last night " !
Not as simple as that, you cannot just take a new supply off an existing board without checking the total existing loads, it is not an infinate supply of power and could well be on it's limits even taking diversity into account.
I was referring to 25% of vehicles using unwanted off peak wind power. What has that got to do with the other 75%.I think it's questionable whether we would be able to afford the luxury of personal EVs if we ever get to the point of 100% green electricity.
Particularly bearing in mind the other major changes on the way.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news...ions-from-cars-facts-and-figures-infographics
Just the scale of the problem.I was referring to 25% of vehicles using unwanted off peak wind power. What has that got to do with the other 75%.
They have one thing in common with a smart phone and that is they are not very smart!With these new fangled smart meters
That will be what they are calling the Internet of things IOT, a totally connected house and again something to avoid, would you want Alexa in total control or rely on it to ensure your house does not freeze whilst you are away, forget it still early days and I don't believe in being a guinea pig at my expense.With these new fangled smart meters that monitor your electricity usage why don't they use them to monitor your electricity usage and stop charging the car when you are boiling the kettle and the fridge freezer compressor is running.
Enter your email address to join: