Wood I.D...

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

goldeneyedmonkey

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
0
Location
Buxton, Derbyshire
Hello folks,

Quick wood I.D please, got these F.O.C, 4 of 36", 4"x2"'s. I'm thinking Iroko, what d'ust reckon? Here's a small piece planed:

IMG_2966.jpg

IMG_2964.jpg

IMG_2961.jpg

IMG_2956.jpg

IMG_2954.jpg


Cheers _Dan
 
I'm also thinking Sapele. I have a few boards (pack away in storage, or I could go grab one) and the look is very similar. It looks like it has the same open grain.
 
Hudson Carpentry":2cfg3ft9 said:
My first thought was meranti but most of the African woods look to similar to me.
...and therein lies the difficulty, but I'd go for sapele as well - Rob
 
Well I'll throw in Utile or Mahogany. More likely Utile, looking at the open grain in the one photo.
Does the end grain have very marked alternate stripes of dark and light fibres. If so it's 99% Utile. Good stuff and works well as a mahogany substitute.

If it is Luan (Philippine Mahogany) it will be quite soft, and have a pesky, rowed grain.

John
 
I'm not sure where it is on the 'soft scale' as I don't use many hardwoods. I mainly work with Oak, Ash and the dreaded Redwood. If you press your thumbnail HARD down against the 90° arris then it does dent a tiny bit.

IMG_2973.jpg

IMG_2972.jpg

IMG_2971.jpg


Cheers _Dan
 
goldeneyedmonkey":28njzxh5 said:
I'm not sure where it is on the 'soft scale' as I don't use many hardwoods. I mainly work with Oak, Ash
Now there's a contradiction...if you work mainly with oak and ash, both are classified as 'hardwoods' (as is balsa btw) whilst yew (which is harder than either oak or ash) is a 'softwood'. The classification of timbers has nothing to do with the physiacal characteristics but is entirely governed by the botanical nature of the tree - Rob
 
I know they're hardwoods Rob, I was merely pointing out that these are the only two hardwoods I have any experience of as I don't work with any others at the mo. I was just saying the 'soft scale' to indicate how soft it felt, it could as easily have been the 'dense scale'. I know that some hardwoods are indeed soft, and softwoods hard, but isn't it a general rule of thumb that most hardwoods are harder than most softwoods? - I really don't know, so can you enlighten me?

Cheers _Dan
 
goldeneyedmonkey":265mar1r said:
I know that some hardwoods are indeed soft, and softwoods hard, but isn't it a general rule of thumb that most hardwoods are harder than most softwoods? - I really don't know, so can you enlighten me?

Cheers _Dan
As a general rule Dan, that's the case, but when I was teaching it was a point that many of the kids found puzzling :? ..'but sir, how can you have a hard softwood and a soft hardwood?' It is worth keeping in mind when you're assessing timbers and I use the 'thumbnail' trick like you. If it only makes a tiny depression in the wood then it's pretty hard and if it leaves a damn great depression then it's dead soft - Rob
 
woodbloke":b8ow8hlk said:
As a general rule Dan, that's the case, but when I was teaching it was a point that many of the kids found puzzling :? ..'but sir, how can you have a hard softwood and a soft hardwood?' It is worth keeping in mind when you're assessing timbers and I use the 'thumbnail' trick like you. If it only makes a tiny depression in the wood then it's pretty hard and if it leaves a damn great depression then it's dead soft - Rob

Cheers mate :D _Dan.
 
That end grain looks like utile, but it shows better if you rub some meths across it.
I rate Luan on the 'soft scale' as equal to deal or pine, the average soft stuff from B&Q.
Nowhere near as hard as Ask or Oak.

HTH
John :)
 
Back
Top