I find it interesting that there are quite a number of negative comments concerning the legs and the seeming weakness in their cantilevered form. I suspect this form is deliberately chosen for both practical seating requirements, although I'm not quite convinced this requirements is fully satisfied, and also to present that visual strength question.
My first thought was that it reminded me of the similar structural question marks presented by pedestal tables that link to the floor via three or four legs emerging from near the bottom of the pedestal at something like 95 to maybe 110 degrees from the central vertical plane of the pedestal. Solutions were found for the leg to pedestal joint via everything from sliding dovetails to M&Ts to dowels, plus screwed on metal spoke affairs fixed to the underside - some of those structural arrangements work better than others.
The Hilton design in question here could involve an angled metal plate and epoxy resin where the plate is morticed into both the vertical wood part and into the top of the splayed foot element. That's just a first thought on my part, and I could be well off course and there's another solution using only wood.
Still, the complaint voiced by some about the potential weakness caused by this cantilevered design strikes me as a bit odd because, as I've illustrated, the pedestal table style falls into a similar category, and yet somehow thousands of this style have been produced over the centuries. Would anyone expect that style to survive gross abuse? I suspect not, and I've seen and repaired quite a few pedestal tables where the leg to pedestal interface had failed or was failing. It wouldn't really surprise me to find similar problems developing over time with the Hilton design. In both cases (table styles) the cause of any joint failure could be anything from flawed construction and/or technical choices, general wear and tear and all the way to gross abuse.
As to some of the pricing comments voiced here, I find it laughably remarkable and naive that any contributor, all woodworkers of one sort or another surely(?), would think paying only ~£2,000 for such a product was excessive, factory mass produced as this table surely is. I can easily see charging £5,000 and upwards for something similar if I was asked to make a one-off, but then that's the difference; one-offs generally cost a substantial amount more than mass produced stuff. I can see, for a one-off, and without doing any real pricing, something north of probably 80 - 100 hours work, plus materials so, to me, that ~£2,000 seems pretty good on the whole, ha, ha. Slainte.