bugbear":2kf1qmws said:
(snip)
Notably, the blades in more recent Veritas tools. I think it's a cunning ploy to give the Veritas Jig "an edge" over the Eclipse.
(snip)
BugBear
Now Paul - you know we wouldn't do that on purpose... :roll: :lol:
In fact - we had to taper some blade sides so we could maximize width within the body, and still allow the blade to be skewed without contacting the sidewalls... (the skewing being necessary to compensate for out-of-square sharpening)...sort of a catch-22
At low bed angles - the skew required to compensate for an out-of-square blade is significant...
Your points about wheel widths and blade widths are good ones though - the guide is meant only to provide repeatable angles...it's a guide - not a fixture...
I've always squared by eye - as the fingertip pressure applied at the blade tip tends to ensure that existing geometry is maintained.
The new guide (we get first castings this week!) will "address" virtually all points discussed here...
It's heavier, and more complex (in design) - but is much more "fixture-like".
The challenge with any honing device design is to design one to cover a wide range of blade sizes and shapes, while not relying on the blades themselves to have any particular tolerances (parallel sides, parallel surfaces etc.). Our new one extends the envelope quite a bit - and will use only the back face (non-bevel side) and the cutting edge for registration...
Cheers -
Rob