User manuals

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

yetloh

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2008
Messages
1,582
Reaction score
218
Location
Sussex
Good to see a magazine having the guts to offend advertisers by writing about the disgraceful quality of far too many manuals for woodworking power tools and machinery and to name some names. The August issue of Furniture & Cabinetmaking has an excellent article by Geoffrey Laycock. He has a health and safety background and goes through the requirements in some detail, which contrary to popular belief, are not designed to drown us in red tape but to keep us safe in practical ways.

He says the law requires manuals should be easy to read and have good illustrations, graphs and tables placed near the text to which they relate. They should deal with intended uses for a given piece of kit but also reasonably foreseeable misuses. Manuals should be on paper – not everyone has ready access to a computer – but should also be available on line in case paper versions are damaged or go missing. This applies to earlier machines as well as those currently being made and online versions should be updated where appropriate.

As to the names, the article is based on the personal experience of the author and a reader of the magazine, so the names quoted are limited in number. Record Power and particularly Axminster get a pat on the back which, in the latter case is specially commendable given that most of their kit is imported from China with, no doubt, woeful translations of equally inadequate originals. Manuals supplied with a Scheppach planer thicknesser, Hammer bandsaw and a SIP table saw are described as appalling. SIP and NMA Agencies (Scheppach) are essentially importers of other makers products (as are Hammer when it comes to bandsaws) and they are clearly failing in their duties. If Axminster can make the effort to get it right, so should they. Many Chinese imports are available from more than one supplier in the same or near identical form, so if you could check out the manuals on line who wouldn’t buy an Axminster labelled version over some other name with a rubbish manual even if it was a few quid cheaper?

Brickbats also go to Festool by name and the many other power tool makers with fiddly, often poorly written or translated little manuals with those horrible little fold out diagrams. From my experience, that also goes for Makita.

As I said earlier the names in the article are few, but I think the members of this forum have the collective experience to give a pretty good market wide view so that we can all make properly informed choices. While we can all benefit, I think this could be especially useful for the less experienced for whom proper instructions and safety advice are so vital. Thoughts anyone?

Jim
 
RTFM!
(only when all other options have been exhausted :D )
Joking aside, that comes from having read or having attempted to read so many lousy manuals. Many seem to have been written by my wife then translated in and out of ten other languages.
 
The two worst lately have been one of those plug in devices from Maplin's that show electricity used, we went back to them and complained - no one in the shop knew how it worked and all they could offer was an online version of the same instructions. It was the most expensive in the range. No one who seen it so far has the foggiest idea how to work it - and a programmeable doorbell (that wasn't why it was bought, honest!) that had very clear instructions on how to set it, which button to press when ... but neglected to tell you which button was which. :? :D
 
I have just bought an oldish SCM spindle moulder with no manuals. I approached SCM UK and they have been able to send me a full operating manual, parts list and programmer module instruction book. Well written in clear English. Also, although my particular machine wasnt included, they have a download section of their website with a huge number of pdf manuals available, which jnclude SCM classical and Minimax ranges.
 
yetloh":22xfbmaf said:
Manuals ... should deal with intended uses for a given piece of kit but also reasonably foreseeable misuses.

You can make something foolproof, but you'll never make it damn-fool proof.

The biggest problem I've had with manuals are the ones translated into English from some incomprehensible language.
 
Sadly, judging by the response, it looks like Matroberts and Phil.P's toungue in cheek responses may be an all too true represenatation of reality. I had thought it might be possible to build a pretty comprehensive picture of who are the good guys and who are the bad, in something I think is very important, but hey ho...

Jim
 
I think there is a serious point behind the jokes. A well designed tool should be designed in such a way that it is obvious how to use it and with adjustment mechanisms that are properly labelled. Except for specialist procedures, the manual in many cases should be superfluous.

Heath and Safety legislation has been a big contributory factor in making manual poor. Manufacturers have to cover themselves with risk warnings, which is fair enough, but this surrounds the information we really need with a lot of material that most people will not read.

To suggest s good one: I recently bought a large 110v Hilti circular saw from a member here. Excellent tool and it is completely obvious on the tool what every adjustment lever does. The manual is well written and clear anyway though. I suspect it is easier to write a good manual for a well designed tool.
 
Back
Top