Size limit of uploaded pictures

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

toolsntat

Yep, I collect tools and tat
Joined
8 Dec 2007
Messages
2,502
Reaction score
579
Location
Leicestershire England
Just a thought :idea:
In reality just how far away is the normal picture size from those that are allowed to be uploaded to this forum?

What with all the photo trouble malarkey perhaps if the limit was increased a little it would help alleviate picture posting problems.

Cheers
Andy
 
toolsntat":37mifeq8 said:
Just a thought :idea:
In reality just how far away is the normal picture size from those that are allowed to be uploaded to this forum?

What with all the photo trouble malarkey perhaps if the limit was increased a little it would help alleviate picture posting problems.

Cheers
Andy

There are two issues with larger photo files one of forum storage space and secondly consideration to members who might be reading on phones or live in parts of the world where the internet string is very thin and download of large pics takes forever or takes chunks out of personal data allowance.

I moderate on another forum and triggered by the photobucket fiasco, we have managed to implement uploads of the output of most normal cameras say around the 15MB region.

Uploading is a two stage process when it hits the forum software, firstly an auto resizing to keep our storage consumption manageable (we refuse to take advertising so the cost of running the forum are paid for by the moderators) and there is a second resize when the picture is viewed in a forum post. If a member wants to look in more detail and can cope with the bandwidth, they can click on the photo and see it in higher resolution.
It seems to work well and the only images we have to exclude are the humongous ones produced by panoramic camera shots.

Member reaction has been good so far since we launched the new feature at the weekend.

Maybe something like this would work here?
 
Any change to forum software can only be implemented by Charley. Any change to or of the software is down to him.
Whilst I agree that the software could do with at the very least some tweaks or indeed updating or replacing altogether with a newer, easier to use (for computer operators with L plates) interface, there are guides on how to upload pictures and if one can read and follow instructions then it should be a relatively simple and straightforward process. If the guides do not make any sense please let us know and and we'll try and work through it.
 
Overall, I think this is evidence that Charley (who owns this site) has turned his attention elsewhere and is no longer actively developing it...

Meanwhile, although I've not tried every resizer programme/app I was bothered that generally the resizing options were based on image size in pixels, not file size in Mb / kb.
I recently found a better option using Irfan View where you can re-size to fit under the forum limit and posted this about it:
Unfortunately I put it in the wrong place but here's a link to it:

resizing-photos-to-under-256-kb-t107418.html
 
AndyT":3oh3bqjd said:
Overall, I think this is evidence that Charley (who owns this site) has turned his attention elsewhere and is no longer actively developing it...

Meanwhile, although I've not tried every resizer programme/app I was bothered that generally the resizing options were based on image size in pixels, not file size in Mb / kb.
I recently found a better option using Irfan View where you can re-size to fit under the forum limit and posted this about it:
Unfortunately I put it in the wrong place but here's a link to it:

resizing-photos-to-under-256-kb-t107418.html
I think we need to enjoy this place while it lasts. Hopefully Charley will live to 150 years old ! I guess the forum will die as there will be no contingencies in place to keep it going

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 
If the owner of this site (for any reason) no longer participates, it should be a simple procedure for another person (or group of persons) to carry the show forwards.
Several years ago I was on an american motorcycle forum that had exactly that happen to it, and the forum still continues.
 
sunnybob":1dd260om said:
If the owner of this site (for any reason) no longer participates, it should be a simple procedure for another person (or group of persons) to carry the show forwards.
Several years ago I was on an american motorcycle forum that had exactly that happen to it, and the forum still continues.
How does that work ? Like a hostile takeover ? :lol:

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 
No, not hostile at all. It was started by one guy. After almost 15 years he had moved on with his life, didnt own that brand of motorcycle any more , etc etc.
He gave notice he was no longer going to pay for the forum, and a couple other members took over the payments. Completely seamless transition.
 
That's all well and good if he gives notice. What if Charley pops his clogs tonight ?

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 
sunnybob":sbss0vkm said:
I can see youre a half empty kind of guy.
Just saying it how it is Bob. I think it was partly the reason Sustins started his new forum.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 
You possibly missed all the drama cause you joined after.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 
Sounds like you need a consortium, and a business plan, and a... and a...

Hope it works out.
 
There are several issues in this thread, and I think I experienced them when I owned a photography forum. Server space for user content can be expensive, and when I owned the photography forum, I didn't allow members to post images directly. Since all of the members were photographers, with huge image files, I would have run out of space in a few weeks with the basic plan I had (about $240 per month for a leased dedicated server and six static IP addresses).

Instead, members use their own image hosting sites, the minority was Photobucket, and linked images using the IMG tag built into BBCode. This solved two problems: server expansion and copyright issues. Since the images were not hosted on my server, members who decided to take their toys and go elsewhere could change the links on their image hosting site and the images in the threads were like Photobucket is now...broken.

The other major issue in this thread is the ownership. If anything happens to the owner, then the future of UKW could be in jeopardy. Again, in my case, I inherited the photography forum after the remaining original owner lost interest over time. His original partner in the forum died years earlier and had been the main administrator. I started out as a member, then became a moderator, and very shortly after that became one of two Super Administrators who had complete control over the server and database. For the next couple of years I effectively maintained the server, database, saving the daily backups offsite, and had been paying about 75-percent of the annual operating costs. The original server and OS had reached their end of life and it was starting to show. I had to reboot the server at least once a week, rebuild and reindex the database every month, and security patches were no longer available for the version of vBulletin we were using. It was a sinking ship and catastrophic failure was only a matter of time.

As soon as I became the owner, I began the process to lease a new server from the same host and transition from vBulletin to XenForo. By December of the year I became the owner, the transition was complete and the website was stable. The move to the new server and forum software was done overnight, but only after two months of testing on the test server. After several more years, my interests in photography changed and I handed the baton to a new owner earlier this year.

In my case, transfer of ownership to me, and recently to the current owner, was smooth and pleasant. Had the original owner not cared or gone to his great reward, the website would have vanished at the first failure because I would not have been able to do anything with the domain name. I empathize with the UKW Moderators, because I truly know what is involved in moderating a discussion forum. I hope that some have full admin privileges to plug the holes, turn on the bilge pumps, and make adjustments as required. If not, then the future of UKW is one failure away.

I was (am) a member of another website specializing in Whitefriars glass. Sadly, this website is gone because someone with access to the hosting site cancelled the hosting without telling the current administrator or owner. Everything was lost, but the owner found some old backups and might be able to restore some content.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top