Period timbers

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

marcros

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2011
Messages
11,302
Reaction score
745
Location
Leeds
I am not sure how best to ask this, but what timbers would be in-keeping/typical with the original features of UK houses?

So, for Edwardian, Victorian, prewar, post-war houses, what timbers would be used for skirtings, doors, etc.
 
Everything I’ve cut into or taken apart in my property has been slow grown pine except the stair handrail which I think is mahogany.

Fitz.
 
In which case, what should I search for for slow growing pine? Southern yellow, redwood, whitewood or...
 
scots pine or baltic soured pine or douglas fir would be my suggestions
 
'Redwood' is about the equivalent, but as said, douglas fir is good too. Look for timber which has the annual rings closer together therefore slower grown. Pitch pine was sometimes used but very difficult to find now unfortunately.
 
I used to trawl those architectural reclamation places looking for old skirting. It was quarter-sawn oak and made excellent drawer sides.
 
"Unsorted" redwood. i.e. top quality but no longer graded as 1st, 2nd, 3rd. The next grade is 4th which may be OK, but not for fine details such a sash window glazing bars.
This is the most common but they used lots of other stuff.
"Redwood" is the common name for scots pine timber. All imported from northern Europe mainly Sweden, and north Russia
 
@phil aye. but if that wood has had my norwegian holiday experiences it'll be soured too :)
 
Go up the food chain and oak and other hardwoods would have taken the place of softwoods in many circumstances.
 
I suspect there was regional variation. I've never seen oak skirtings etc. that weren't new and I've never seen an oak window. The quality of timber (and craftsmanship) in a lot of Victorian and Edwardian woodwork I've come across was appalling - what did it matter? They weren't to know that hundreds of thousands of clowns were going to come along decades later, throw the doors in caustic tanks and strip the white gloss paint. :D
Incidentally, NZ (and undoubtedly others) use skirtings that are bought in two parts. A high grade piece is used for the part that carries the moulding and a lesser grade can be used for the base board.
 
ED65":3mcacsah said:
Go up the food chain and oak and other hardwoods would have taken the place of softwoods in many circumstances.
More a case of back down the timeline. As redwood and other softwoods became available they replaced hardwoods, being lighter, easier to machine or hand work, better for fine details, available in long straight lengths etc. A lot of top class work was done in pine.
 
phil.p":3o6gjegz said:
..... The quality of timber (and craftsmanship) in a lot of Victorian and Edwardian woodwork I've come across was appalling
Really? Not my experience I'd say exactly the opposite. Reached a peak of perfection pre WW1, downhill thereafter. True that stripping is usually a mistake - the material was selected for painting and may have puttied holes , huge knots etc. perfectly OK under paint
Incidentally, NZ (and undoubtedly others) use skirtings that are bought in two parts. A high grade piece is used for the part that carries the moulding and a lesser grade can be used for the base board.
Ditto here with elaborate Victorian/Georgian skirtings and architraves - two or three pieces built up, sometimes more, to form a complex moulding.
 
Back
Top