NOT TO BE MISSED

[devonwoody]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGIvk5sR8n4#t=76

 

[themackay]

Very entertaining

 

[bugbear]

what is it?

BugBear

 

[Jack (W)]

Hi Devonwoody,

"NOT TO BE MISSED" you say, but you missed telling us what your Youtube link refers to.

I'd be grateful if you would provide further information (the Youtube title perhaps) so that I can decide for myself whether or not I'm likely to consider it - for me personally - "not to be missed".

Many thanks,

Jack (W)

 

[Random Orbital Bob]

That's a classic

 

[Spindle]

Hi

I'll give it a miss for now - I'm sure it will come up again if it's worth watching, (perhaps then with a short explanation by way of courtesy).

Aren't these postings of unidentified links bordering on SPAM??

Regards Mick

 

[Random Orbital Bob]

I think you're being a bit harsh chaps. Devon posted a perfectly innocent and funny clip which you only have to click on to review and decide if it's for you or not. Not sure he deserves such a drubbing for it. If it not being labelled isn't your cup of tea, why not just exercise that right. Is it really necessary to embarrass him publicly by informing everyone you're not planning to click it?

 

[Jamesc]

I am with Bob on this, come on guys this is supposed to be a friendly forum

James

 

[bugbear]

I am with Bob on this, come on guys this is supposed to be a friendly forum

James

Perhaps a short description/review would also be friendly?

BugBear

 

[nanscombe]

How about ...

Golden Retriever With Perfect Pitch.

 

[bugbear]

How about ...

Golden Retriever With Perfect Pitch.

Ah - cute animal video on youtube. That gives me just the information I need to decide wether it's truly "NOT TO BE MISSED".

BugBear (giving it a miss)

 

[RogerS]

How about ...

Golden Retriever With Perfect Pitch.

Ah - cute animal video on youtube. That gives me just the information I need to decide wether it's truly "NOT TO BE MISSED".

BugBear (giving it a miss)

I agree with you entirely. Would also have given it a miss if I'd known what it was about. Instead went ahead and clicked

 

[Racers]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation ... fGQLHKx-Y0

Nora (a cat) plays the piano (Pianoforte) :wink:

Pete

 

[devonwoody]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_108484943&feature=iv&list=UUgwhBlp2PpvsW9b07DfxMRA&src_vid=v0zgQAp7EYw&v=5fGQLHKx-Y0

Nora (a cat) plays the piano (Pianoforte) :wink:

Pete

Brilliant, that was better than mine.

 

[doorframe]

What a miserable bunch you are. :lol:

Nice one, DW.

 

[doorframe]

Preferred the cat , though! :wink:

 

[DrPhill]

If you want cute animals........ try this

 

[monkeybiter]

What a miserable bunch you are. :lol:

Nice one, DW.

=D> Most definitely, yet a similarly undescribed link gained only praise today [ever struggled with a project?]

Surely it takes less time to click a link, decide you don't like it and close it, than click reply, consult you dictionary for the big words, and type a sour response.