Modifying record sash clamps

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ColeyS1

Established Member
Joined
2 Nov 2009
Messages
4,245
Reaction score
39
I always thought record t bar clamps were the best general purpose clamps money could buy. Over the years I've acquired quite a few.
I was setting the scriber up on the tenoner, but it was proving alot more difficult than it should be. Pushing the joints together by hand, all was well, introducing the sash clamps caused a slight gap on one of the shoulders, not quite half a mm but still frustrating.
I've known for a while the slidey part of the clamp wasn't square under pressure, just hadn't realised it was quite so much. I've often found I had to leave a clamp on the odd wedged joint, because one shoulder was ever so slightly gappy. The slidey part being out of square, wouldn't help.
ebcc3168013c00ef9a9b6c8a51b929d1.jpg

That's the worst one, it must be 3mm out of square under pressure !!!!
The threaded end always seemed fine. It's pushing in the middle of the clamp head so even though it's sloppy on the rail, it's always uptight to what ever it's clamping.
The easiest fix would have been to glue a tapered wedge to the offending clamp head, or wedge the head off the rail somehow with a wedge to keep it pushed up tight . Neither of these ideas seemed very good, in terms of durability and ease of use. Ideally replicating the way the threaded end worked, seemed the best solution. It needed something that would put pressure in the middle of the head, but also allow movement of the face of the clamp(to correct the out of square/sloppyness)
54bd332f959aca0552463acea69b83d9.jpg

These are the clamp heads, centre punched and ready to drill. With the coolant running they drill quite easily.
5012014dc640e345589349414804b93f.jpg

This was the proto type assembly. I had some 10mm thick steel 50×60mm and tapped a hole right through it to accept an m8 threaded bar. The bar was then welded in position by welding the hole, then grinding flush. The clamp head had a 9.5mm hole which allowed plenty of movement. A couple washers allow the head to pivot easier and the spring washer near the nylon washered nut, just keeps it under a tiny bit of tension.
It's seemed to work really well so didn't hesitate altering the rest.
a67edc16c787573cf9efca3d19c2b25d.jpg

49d0b6faf95f452ec7b6f65c8800fb06.jpg

06fcd3bab99e358d86cee85350498cba.jpg

b5594d5b75f43eaa6ef3fc2d88e95939.jpg

I've given them a quick wipe of machine wax, so hopefully they'll stay fairly clean. I'd say 80% of the stuff I clamp is either 44 or 57mm thick, so this should really help ! Glued up several doors and sashes over the last few days and so far, it seems like a good modification.
The lighter duty record clamps had the same treatment
75c74fc6269d918a863364aebb6d9b1c.jpg

They were no where near as bad as the t bars, but thought it worth doing.

Seems odd that a decent branded clamp could cause issues instead of curing them, but it certainly seems to be the case.
Just for a laugh, I tried a square on some really old record clamps. ....

d288761c3703d56efd6883cb0789e04f.jpg

They really don't make em like they use to, do they !?!?!!!! (100% bang on square) :lol:
Cheers
Coley
 
Interesting. All mine are old, second hand off the bay. Just checked them. All square or very close indeed. Just so happens I use a pair of big ones to squeeze up 9 off 4" by 4" oak rafters to cut birds beaks in them.
 
They must have worked to smaller tolerances back in the day.
I know besseys have always advertised as clamping square, just thought record t bars could take a bit more banging about.

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 
That's a really neat solution Coley. Nice one. I use 4mm box steel and I have a variety of paramo, old record and rutlands heads. Quality is also in that order with a big drop off for the rutlands ones (they still work mind). I just use slim wooden wedges under either head and it works fine for me but that's just me in my shed, yours is a far better solution obviously, especially in your situation. Kudos mate.
Thought the steel was rubber at first glance.....which gave me an idea.... :D I'll keep my eye out for a bit of freebie rubber matting of the right bouncey/hard type at work. Is there a scale for that I wonder? Them engineers electrical mats they have in plantrooms might do.
I can picture it now....
Engineer 1: Dave..... Dave! Does the electrical mat look ..I dunno.... a bit smaller to you
Engineer 2: Dunno Dave. It does a bit doesn't it? The OD looks the same but the internal characteristics have altered somewhat. It could be a trick of the light? A failure of its its inherent dampening capacities looks statistically more likely in all honesty.
Engineer 1: What. You mean all those regular square holes cut out of it in random places? But Dave, that cant be mice unless they are good at geometry. Or terrific at post conceptual modern art. It's only you and me that come up to the plantroom. Us and the window cleaners and what would they possibly want with a load of square rubber bits?
Engineer 2: It's a mystery.
Engineer 1: You can say that again Dave.
 
Bm101":11zb6zbx said:
That's a really neat solution Coley. Nice one. I use 4mm box steel and I have a variety of paramo, old record and rutlands heads. Quality is also in that order with a big drop off for the rutlands ones (they still work mind). I just use slim wooden wedges under either head and it works fine for me but that's just me in my shed, yours is a far better solution obviously, especially in your situation. Kudos mate.
Thought the steel was rubber at first glance.....which gave me an idea.... :D I'll keep my eye out for a bit of freebie rubber matting of the right bouncey/hard type at work. Is there a scale for that I wonder? Them engineers electrical mats they have in plantrooms might do.
I can picture it now....
Engineer 1: Dave..... Dave! Does the electrical mat look ..I dunno.... a bit smaller to you
Engineer 2: Dunno Dave. It does a bit doesn't it? The OD looks the same but the internal characteristics have altered somewhat. It could be a trick of the light? A failure of its its inherent dampening capacities looks statistically more likely in all honesty.
Engineer 1: What. You mean all those regular square holes cut out of it in random places? But Dave, that cant be mice unless they are good at geometry. Or terrific at post conceptual modern art. It's only you and me that come up to the plantroom. Us and the window cleaners and what would they possibly want with a load of square rubber bits?
Engineer 2: It's a mystery.
Engineer 1: You can say that again Dave.
Ha ha ha, that made me chuckle ! I guess tough rubber would do the same thing. I like your imagination!
Coley

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 
It's the same problem with Bessey's and pretty much every other cramp out there. A popular solution is a glue block with a "D" shaped profile, then the pressure is exerted right through the centre of the joint no matter how the cramp itself twists or deforms.
 
Back
Top