How old is this roof?

UKworkshop.co.uk

Help Support UKworkshop.co.uk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
You can't beat a roof with Sarking, counter batten then tile batten. I still prefer the Hessian reinforced tar felt as well.
When doing a roof for yourself or customers, use the maximum head lap, not the minimum. Roof lap cover is like oil changes on an engine..............cheapest insurance you can get. On massive sites years ago we were instructed to use minimum headlap. Some bean counter was saving a few thousand tiles on 200 houses
 
You can't beat a roof with Sarking, counter batten then tile batten. I still prefer the Hessian reinforced tar felt as well.
When doing a roof for yourself or customers, use the maximum head lap, not the minimum. Roof lap cover is like oil changes on an engine..............cheapest insurance you can get. On massive sites years ago we were instructed to use minimum headlap. Some bean counter was saving a few thousand tiles on 200 houses
You can save on the battens with "Scottish Sarking" - tiles nailed direct to the boards with no battens.
Had to do that here - restoration of 1845 roof and adding battens would change all the edge details.
The original tar felt was still in situ but completely deteriorated and had to be brushed off in clouds of black dust. Replaced with Tyvek. Replaced a few bits of board but otherwise original - failed in a few spots where they had scrimped on lead flashing or slate slipped, but survived 160 years otherwise.
 
You do need modern breathable membrane and I would also install 50mm Brash battens for easier nailing and longevity. Cheap battens split when nailed allowing rain in instead of running into the membrane sag. +1 for max headlap also correct fitting of ridge tiles.
 
Thanks for all the responses, I’ll try to ‘cover’ all queries/advice here….

The roof construction is somewhat as expected in that it’s a combination of trusses (the majority) with some cut rafters - everything at 600 centres.

Based on the minimum lap specified for the tiles (75mm) the gauge should have been 325mm but, as intimated earlier, a CONSIDERABLE number of the tiles showed a gauge of around 350/360mm (ie 50/40mm lap) and so we have (obviously) completely removed and replaced with the correct gauge which has resulted in an extra course on each of the slopes worked on.

I do find it hard to believe that someone would even attempt such a roof without understanding how to work out a gauge etc…..we’ve debated this to death and considered whether or not he…..ran out of money and tried to save tiles (eg given no overhang on SOME initial courses); bought a job lot of ‘seconds’? (a considerable number of nibs were missing); didn’t pay/fell out with his roofer (if he didn’t do it himself) who then cut corners; inadvertently built the house slightly out of square - this is an interesting one because there is some evidence of ‘creep’ which I would describe as the strange phenomenon between adjacent slopes where the distance between fascia and ridge should be exactly the same and at the same pitch, but are apparently not - it then could be that he started on the one slope (the largest as it happens) that has the correct gauge and subsequently worked his way around the house on adjacent slopes BUT trying to maintain the same batten positions instead of rechecking the gauge calculation…..this would then offer some kind of answer as to why the gauge appears to be getting worse by the time he got to the rear slopes?……still doesn’t forgive other basic setting out issues however.

I do (and did) take the point about checking the slopes that we’re not going to work on and ultimately gave my mate all of the info he needed to make the ultimate decision…..don’t get me wrong, if there was anything even remotely causing an issue I wouldn’t have let him say ‘no’ to redoing those slopes. However, based on his historic observations and the obvious water leaks suffered over the years we‘ve identified (as far as I’m concerned) all of the reasons for those problems and, as I say, he‘s now well armed to make the reasoned choice….in fact we laughed the other day as he was commenting on just how much he’s picked up and read about since I’ve been sending him web links etc…..I said “that’ll come in handy after we’ve left and the rain floods in - you can sort it out yourself” :LOL::ROFLMAO:….made me laugh anyway!……Based on the above we ARE going to leave a number of slopes as they are knowing that there gauge is wrong because there are no penetrating issues whatsoever, they are also more sheltered.

Now, here’s another potential can of worms that I wasn’t even going to mention……..the house has a lovely bathroom plus an additional small wc/whb room within the double garage which is extremely handy for use by anyone with dirty garden boots or anyone (like us) working on the house (tradesmen’s entrance etc) but…….WAIT FOR IT……on the first day he says to me “we don’t do number two’s in there”, “why not” I enquired, “well“ he says “the drainage from that room runs to a soakaway” :oops::oops::oops::oops::oops::oops::oops::eek::eek:

Both myself and my other mate (an older very experienced tradesman) laughed that off by saying, something like “impossible”, “no chance”, “wouldn’t have got away with it” etc etc but he’s adamant that the prev owner told him that they added it after the house had been finished, certified etc and so no one would ever know and so (in the prev owner’s words) “just for info, we only ever pee in there so be careful”…….you couldn’t write it!!!!

Anyway, I’m going to have a look at it when we’ve finished the roof as they’ve already been using it (for number ones) for years and I’ve got my hands somewhat full with the roof at the mo :unsure:

I‘m painting a very dismal picture of my mate here but it’s made me realise that even ‘seemingly’ bright people (he’s a consultant manager - not anywhere near construction btw) don’t necessarily understand how things, whose workings I take for granted, are supposed to be put together and supposed to function.

On a final note - this is the first time I’ve actually sat back to consider the ultimate repercussions of what a simple line (drawn by an architect) actually results in with regard to the guy at the sharp end when building the house. I’ve long given up now but for years used to do drawings for planning/building regs and although I didn’t need to produce any architectural award-winning designs (mine were mostly extensions) it has made me rethink this process. We had this same discussion when working on the the rear slopes of the house where the rear cavity wall could have been made longer instead of including the small return which resulted in the roof requiring another ‘return’ slope with a width of no more than 1200mm but possessing a hip at one side and a valley at the other……all bloody cuts!!!!!!! I’ll have nightmares about these till I die.
 
Interesting thread.

Your point about your friend being bright but not understanding what he is buying resonates with me. Most house purchases are the biggest financial transaction people make but they crack on without anything more than a mortgage valuation.
 
1, when I left California 40 odd years ago.....architects had to work 2 years on the tools to qualify......
2, looking at the photo of that house, with such a complicated roof he prob was running outta money and
getting fed up with it all.....
 
...40 odd years ago.....architects had to work 2 years on the tools to qualify......
That's surely not right? My first choice as a career was as an Architect and the apprenticeship period was 7 years - the careers officer poo-pooed my suggestion since I'd not had a grammar school education and I drifted into an engineering apprenticeship of 5 years starting in 1956.
 
That's surely not right? My first choice as a career was as an Architect and the apprenticeship period was 7 years - the careers officer poo-pooed my suggestion since I'd not had a grammar school education and I drifted into an engineering apprenticeship of 5 years starting in 1956.
Moderators! Block this chap, please. He went to a Secondary Modern school!

I went to a Grammar School whilst my elder brother went to a Secondary Modern. He retired at 49 and lives in the South of France whilst I must work until I die.

Great thread, Lard. You are a very good friend!
 
The WHOLE house was a self-build 11yrs ago and, although I knew my mate had bought it, I didn’t realise the original owner/builder had hardly lived in it himself. By all accounts he did the roof himself.
Looks like your mate bought a new self build house which had no NHBC or similar insurance. That was a warning to be careful. He then presumably did not have a full structural survey done, which was unwise. If he knew about the toilet to a soak away before purchase then that was a real warning to be careful. He did not have a clue about building but appears to have proceeded without taking professional advice.

I have built two houses, the first was basically self build, I employed tradesmen but did a lot of the work myself. Sold it back in the 1980’s with no problem and no come backs, it had NHBC. The second house was completed recently, employed a builder (LABC Building Excellence Award winner, West Midlands Area) who I have known for years, and that has NHBC.
 
That's surely not right? My first choice as a career was as an Architect and the apprenticeship period was 7 years - the careers officer poo-pooed my suggestion since I'd not had a grammar school education and I drifted into an engineering apprenticeship of 5 years starting in 1956.
College/University study is for seven years, but that does not make the studier qualified no matter what degree they come out with, to join the ARIBA they then need to satisfy the board that they are competent, one of the qualifications for that was (as it used to be) six months working on site, hence the much lamented Resident Architect and back then the Resident Structural Engineer both on larger projects, visiting on smaller construction sites.

Just as an aside the NHBRC certificate is an assurance not insurance.
 
Last edited:
Moderators! Block this chap, please. He went to a Secondary Modern school!

I went to a Grammar School whilst my elder brother went to a Secondary Modern. He retired at 49 and lives in the South of France whilst I must work until I die.

Great thread, Lard. You are a very good friend!
(y)…..and I went to a grammar school! :oops:

..plus I’ll do anything for food :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
Just as an aside the NHBRC certificate is an assurance not insurance

Not sure what you mean by that?

NHBC is a warranty and insurance provider. A warranty is a promise to make good if quality falls short and an insurance policy covers specific events for a specified term which is ten years in the case of Buildmark (the cover provided by NHBC). The combined product effectively means that if the builder fails to make good NHBC will sort it - purchasers of new homes built by builders who are member are issued with a policy document and insurance certificate.

Unless it's changed since I did my exams an assurance policy refers to life insurance that either runs for whole of life or has a savings element attached (an endowment policy) ie it will definitely pay out.
 
Has this house been up for sale recently? (last 6-8 months)
I'm looking at houses to buy, mainly on rightmove, as present, and have seen a bungalow, with a loo and shower room in the back of the garage, which I thought was unusual.

Bod
 
Back
Top