Certainly for the time being the idea is for us (GW) to feature a useful thread from UKW (thanks to Charley for permission) in the mag's Q/A pages. It enables the mag to feature a wider range of views on a subject, rather than necessarily that of just a couple of mag 'experts' , and in return opens up UKW to more potential posters. A good trade-off I reckon.Any plans to make this a regular feature in GWW?
Go on then, let see the link to our star post-of-the-month!Noely":1dab0k0j said:Yes Adam, you are featured, well 6 words to be precise......
Dog, John Elliot, Waterhead37 and Dewy are the main cast.
I wondered that too. But then it's out there in the public domain anyhow, isn't it? But it might be a nice courtesy, if Pete or Andy could find the time.gidon":1qp177kz said:couldn't the GWW editor check on this newsgroup with the people contributing to the chosen thread that they are happy with their words of wisdom being published?
I agree it's in the public domain - but it doesn't really belong to anyone - except maybe Charley - although doubt he feels that way. Here we can delete, edit and come back to posts - perhaps in defence! Once published it becomes GWW property in that it's one of the pages that sells their magazine.Alf":3l3ptd0o said:But then it's out there in the public domain anyhow, isn't it?
GidonI'm not sure I like the idea of anything we say here having the potential of being published in a magazine without any say.